Translation of "Rechtskräftig abgeschlossen" in English

The purchase agreement is concluded with the confirmation email.

The corruption trials have not yet been finally concluded, but they are seriously under way and it will take time.

Where criminal proceedings against persons referred to in Article 6(2) are concluded, without the possibility of appeal, either by a court decision or otherwise, and that decision is notified to Europol by the Member State or third party concerned, Europol shall verify whether the data affected by such decision may still be stored, modified or used.

Given the preliminary nature of the proceedings underlying an EIO, its execution should not be subject to refusal where it is aimed to establish whether a possible conflict with the ne bis in idem principle exists, or where the issuing authority has provided assurances that the evidence transferred as a result of the execution of the EIO would not be used to prosecute or impose a sanction on a person whose case has been finally disposed of in another Member State for the same facts.

Hoechst further submits that the facts referred to by the Polypropylene decision were definitively settled only in July 1999, and those referred to by the PVC I and PVC II decisions in October 2002, thus long after the facts of the present case had come to an end.

Evidence on terminated rehabilitation proceeding is valid court decision for convicted subject and if the proceeding is not terminated, evidence for the Agency for Restitution is certificate of initiated rehabilitation proceeding in which case the agency will, in accordance with the Law, stop the proceeding by claim for reinstitution of the confiscated property by legal title of confiscation of property, until valid termination of rehabilitation proceeding. 6.

As soon as your payment has been received in the RWTH Aachen account, your enrollment is complete.

If a fine has been imposed on you and you have already paid it, the matter is lawfully terminated hereby and it may not further be appealed against penalty imposition.

According to § 35 of the Act, however, the rule laid down in § 580.8 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not to be applied to cases finally decided before 31 December 2006.

An application for a declaratory judgement, however, must be filed before suing for patent infringement, because an application for a declaratory judgement will be rejected if an infringement action involving the same parties is still pending or has been settled and has entered into force.

A communication dated 7 July 2000 notified the parties to the proceedings that no appeal had been filed within the time limit for appeal and that opposition proceedings had been validly completed.

Such a deviation would, however, exist if the legislature’s wish to define ex post facto the “true” content of previously enacted law, and to correct – including for the past – an interpretation that does not conform with the legislature’s ideas, would only be limited in individual proceedings that have become final, or in the case of legal situations that allow no serious room for interpretation.

Obviously the legislature cannot simply interfere ex post facto in individual proceedings that have become final, or reassess conduct of the past and impose sanctions on that conduct which the parties had no reason to expect.