Translation of "Nicht darauf berufen" in English

Yang Wenguang is not entitled to this privilege.

In doubt one could not refer to that.

We can no longer use the argument that they are better informed.

However, you should not rely solely on supplements alone.

In principle, an injunction debtor could not rely on the fact that this would involve a disproportionate effort.

In case of the envisaged hard Brexit, British companies will no longer benefit from this freedom.

But the material cannot rely solely on this for its own eco image.

KWW cannot pretend that it never attacked the decisions in the parts concerning non-cash aid because the Commission provided a positive decision.

We cannot go on saying that Libya has very important trading relations with European Union Member States and acts as a partner for the European Union in the Mediterranean basin, and putting respect for human rights as a secondary issue.

The principle of subsidiarity could be useful from the point of view of guaranteeing higher levels of protection, where such protection existed, but should not be invoked to dismantle safety protection guarantees.

Once a product incorporating an intellectual property right has been put on the market inside the EEA by the holder or with his consent, the intellectual property right is exhausted in the whole territory of the EEA including the EFTA States in the sense that the holder can no longer use it to control the sale of the product (principle of EEA exhaustion) [10].

Furthermore, the Authority has examined whether the situation described by the Norwegian authorities could be regarded as a serious disturbance within the meaning of Article 61(3)(b), even though not invoked by the Norwegian authorities, and therefore compatible aid.

The changes in the calculations have no impact to the conclusion and the proposal.

The right-holder has no right under intellectual property laws to prevent sales by licensees or buyers of such products incorporating the licensed technology.

In addition, for claims up to 100,000 Special Drawing Rights, the Regulation prevents Community carriers from using the legal defence that they took all possible measures to avoid the accident.

For claims totalling under 100.000 Special Drawing Rights (around € 143.000) per passenger, the carrier is prevented from using the legal defence that he took all possible measures to avoid the accident.

The debtor may not rely on a plea of good faith if the Commission has published a notice in the Official Journal of the European Union stating that there are grounds for doubt concerning the proper application of the preferential arrangements by the beneficiary country or territory.

Moreover, Hungary has not claimed that the aid could be compatible under those rules.

The exceptions laid down in Article 107(3)(b), (d) and (e) are clearly not applicable and have not been invoked by the Greek authorities.

Where a competent authority of a Member State has transmitted personal data, the recipient cannot, in the context of its liability vis-à-vis the injured party in accordance with national law, cite in its defence that the data transmitted were inaccurate.

A Member State may not plead that another Member State or Europol had transmitted inaccurate data in order to avoid its liability under its national legislation vis-à-vis an injured party.

If the researches carried out by the Member State requested which has exercised the right to give a provisional reply yield information which shows that it is liable, that State may not invoke the expiry of the time limit provided for in Article 18(1) as a reason for refusing to comply with a request to take charge.

In the view of the Commission, as a contracting authority in terms of EU procurement law, the city of Munich cannot, as the German authorities have argued, claim that it acted outside its own field of public responsibilities when contracting these services and therefore like any private contractor should have been able to select its subcontractors freely.

In particular, the Court's case law indicates that a Member State cannot invoke the need to restrict its citizens' access to gambling if at the same time public authorities in that Member State incite and encourage people to participate in lotteries, games of chance and betting to the financial benefit of the public purse.

On this point, the ILC project takes a middle course - already adopted in the Vienna Convention on treaty law as regards State bodies unqualified to conclude a treaty - and considers that an international organization cannot claim that its consent to be bound by an agreement was expressed in violation of the rules concerning powers to conclude treaties 'unless such violation was manifest and concerns a fundamentally-important rule of its internal law'.'

In those circumstances, the failure of the Commission, a principal party at first instance, to raise before the Court of First Instance the irregularity invoked by Chronopost and La Poste in support of their ground of appeal before the Court of Justice, and the argument that, as a result, they — interveners at first instance — are no longer entitled to do so in the context of their appeal, cannot properly be relied upon in opposing the Court’s consideration of such a plea.

Orders the appellants to pay the costs of the present proceedings.

Accordingly, the Tribunal held that the candidate for the post could not claim that the administration had created a legitimate expectation in his mind that he would be recruited.