Translation of "Bis zur endgültigen entscheidung" in English

The results of class V4 are suspended until the final decision of the DMSB Court of Appeal will be available.

The asylum applicants must however remain in the airport transit area until a final ruling has been handed down.

The outcome has been that it has taken nine months to adopt a final decision.

On 22 April 2009, Superior Court of Justice of Brazil set Vitalmiro Moura free until a final decision about his request of Habeas corpus.

On 22 April 2009, Superior Court of Justice of Brazil set Vitalmiro Moura free until a final decision about his request of Habeas corpus.

The Customer Journey describes the process visitor takes up until the final decision and conversion.

Our view is that applications for asylum which are denied at first instance must be subject to further appeal to a judicial authority, and that this appeal must be recognized as having a suspensive effect, though without prejudice to the requirement that the applicant must be able to offer a guarantee regarding his temporary residence and his whereabouts pending the final judgement.

But I also wish to add that this procedure will only be able to prove itself in the long term and receive the support of this House if it is adjusted, firstly to take account of budgetary discipline, but also to provide some room for manoeuvre one way or another in the decision-making process, before the final decision is made.

Where there is imminent danger of the spread of harmful organisms or imminent danger for human health or for the environment, that prohibition may be imposed by the Member State concerned as soon as its application has been lodged until such time as a final decision has been taken.

I should like to ask you, Mr President, if the Luxembourg Presidency intends to continue, from now until the final decision, to devote the same amount of care and attention that it has thus far devoted to this issue, and, thus, if this level of commitment is to be kept up.

In particular, the original proposal envisaged, in principle, that an appeal against a ruling rejecting a request for asylum would have a suspensive effect, permitting the asylum-seeker to remain in the territory of the country in question while awaiting a final decision, but States would be able to claim an exception to this rule in certain instances, for example, where a request was rejected as manifestly unfounded.

Where there is imminent danger of the spread of harmful organisms or imminent danger for human health or for the environment, that prohibition may be imposed by the Member State concerned as soon as its application has been lodged until such time as a final decision has been taken. That decision shall be taken within a period of three months in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 23(2) or in Article 23(3) in the case of a genetically modified variety.

Hence, even though the Act had entered into force, the application of the state aid provisions of the Act was suspended awaiting the final decision of the Authority.

Most Member States that apply a two-step procedure (Finland, Germany, Luxembourg, Sweden) have in common that the first decision of the court (“payment order”) is not enforceable at all whereas the second decision that is taken after the expiration of the time limit for objections (“enforcement order”) is “only” provisionally enforceable until the appeal against this ruling has passed.

Pending the final conclusion on the BSE risk status of the Member States, all Member States were provisionally recognised as countries with a controlled BSE risk as laid down in Decision 2007/453/EC.

Pending a final conclusion on the BSE risk status of certain Member States and taking into account the harmonised stringent BSE protective measures applied within the Community, those Member States should remain provisionally recognised as countries with a controlled BSE risk.

Paragraph 94 of the opening decision indicates that the planned retrospective reimbursement of the excess fees charged by the United Kingdom in the period between 17 March 2008 and the final decision seems to constitute additional restructuring aid.

Pending a final conclusion on the BSE risk status of the Member States and taking into account the harmonised stringent BSE protective measures applied within the Community, the Member States should be provisionally recognised as countries with a controlled BSE risk.

In addition, awaiting the final conclusion on the BSE risk status concerning Norway and Iceland and taking into account the results of the most recent risk assessments concerning those third countries, they should be provisionally recognised as countries with a controlled BSE risk.

They believe they have legitimate expectations as to the legality of provisionally maintaining the rescue measures until the Commission takes a final decision on the restructuring plan.

Finally, the letter specifies that the guarantee by the Member States concerned in favour of Dexia, valid until 30 October 2009, could be considered to be compatible with the internal market, on the basis of Article 107(3)(b) TFEU, pending the Commission’s final decision closing the formal procedure.

In order to ensure transparency, equal treatment for applicants and the enhancement of the accountability of authorising officers, it is necessary to lay down the award procedure, from the application for the grant, for which the Commission should have provided minimum information for applicants, to its evaluation in the light of previously specified eligibility, selection and award criteria before the authorising officer responsible takes his final, appropriately documented decision.

One party argued that its request cannot be considered as administratively burdensome after the provisional stage the Commission services still have six months before the definitive determination.

Whilst it is acknowledged that opposition and appeal procedures – from a procedural point of view – are separate procedures, from a commercial perspective, the time until the final decision is taken – be it in opposition or appeal – is relevant.

However, on average, it took more than two years to obtain approximately 80% of final decisions (including appeal procedures).

Provided that the Federal Government does present a comprehensive restructuring plan within six months, this period will be extended until the Commission's definitive decision in the matter.