Translation of "Alle in einen topf werfen" in English

It just seems crazy to lump everyone together.

But Denise insisted we all pool our money.

It would be absurd to put Alewis, Sunnis, and Kurds all in the same pot.

The second point I wish to raise is that we must be careful not to lump all non-signatories together, since this group also includes some countries, such as Finland, who operate a very strict monitoring procedure to ensure that no mines are exported from their territory to other parts of the world.

I would like to end by associating myself with those who are calling for a detailed inquiry at this juncture into where, within the non-governmental organisations, responsibility for what happened lies - clearly, as always, we must avoid putting everything under the same umbrella - for there is no doubt that responsibility does lie somewhere and it must be ascertained where, not least in view of the generosity displayed by the European Union and the European Commission towards non-governmental organisations.

Then we also find ourselves in close proximity to a region that has been showing signs in recent years of religious fanaticism. I do not include everyone, of course.

Worse is the swiftness with which they are systematically dismantling the hard won gains of stakeholders WITHOUT CONSULTATION and the total lack of understanding that would engender them to believe that all Creative Industries can be lumped together.

Of course, there are many different kinds of democratic transitions, and lumping them all together might be misleading.

Parliament, in its perennial quest to go one step further and faster than the Commission and the Council, has wheeled out its regulating steamroller and wants to put all the networks in one basket.

The second point I wish to raise is that we must be careful not to lump all non-signatories together, since this group also includes some countries, such as Finland, who operate a very strict monitoring procedure to ensure that no mines are exported from their territory to other parts of the world.

The mere mention of the various factions of the Brazilian Pentecostalism shows that you cannot lump them all together and simply label them with the cliché "Pentecostals", "Evangelicals" or even only with the incriminating term "sects".

If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or copyrights, or trademarks, or various other different laws, the first step is to forget the idea of lumping them together, and treat them as separate topics.

They could not always differentiate the level of party commitment and tended to lump everyone together.

We should not give up something so unique by losing our credibility through throwing genuine wildlife photos into the same pot with arranged or computer-made pictures, without clearly stating whether they are genuine or substitute wildlife or nature photographs.

Yet in lumping all these components together activists often fail to see the differences between them.

In his day this would have been apparent, and he would not have had to armourplate his words against the propagandist who, today, would accuse him of incriminating all Jews by his allusions to "the auspices of the Jews" and "the influence of the Jews" (which by Mr. Lazare's definition would make him "antisemitic"!).

The real danger now is not the “unconditional” defense of that which is worthy of defense, but direct or indirect help to the political current which tries to identify the USSR with the fascist states for the benefit of the democracies, or to the related current which tries to put all tendencies in the same pot in order to compromise Bolshevism or Marxism with Stalinism.

It is important not to put all interest groups together: the representatives of multinationals or NGOs cannot be treated in the same way as the representatives of democratic local or national authorities.

The answer is to uphold our values with more determination than ever. We must avoid tarring everyone with the same brush, curtailing our sacred freedom of opinion and succumbing to a base logic that would have us see the world through the prism of religious war or even a clash of civilisations.

On that point, it is important not to confuse everything again and lump everything together.

I do not think we can mix things up in this way.

Let us stop mixing up the issues.

There is no point in trying to put everything under one roof.

Observers who merely look on when they should be protecting the victims, people and property.

It is very fashionable at the moment in some parts of the world to talk about the posttraumatic shock of those who fought in the war in Vietnam.

That's if you really pool it all together, and that's for the entire school year.

Lumping everything together blurs the image, and confuses discussion on the subject as to whether we need to correct mistakes or call in the police.

Do not try to put everything in one basket and use renewable sources of energy like a big curtain to cover the truth, which is that a large proportion of European citizens feel anything from reservations to opposition to the use of nuclear energy and that cannot be made to disappear with a magic wand.

As regards bullfighting, we do not accept the rapporteur's position, given that it is wrong to apply a broad brush approach to everything.

If we mix all this up into one single cocktail, we will get carried away for good, sympathetic, political reasons, but we would actually endanger the access of international humanitarian organisations into this troubled arena.

I do not think therefore that we should confuse all of the issues; above all, we must not fall behind schedule, given that the Italian Presidency ends in December and that our work will be completed at the end of April.

It would not be easy to mix everything together and to try to resolve all the issues facing the European Union by 2004.

We must remain vigilant, but must not lump everything together by listing examples of individual attacks perpetrated in Member States fighting against racism and homophobia with extreme positions openly adopted by some governments.

The radioactive cloud, paradoxically, bears one or two par ticles of freedom, because in an equation of this kind, truth cannot be hidden indefinitely.