Übersetzung für "Stellt sich uns die frage" in Englisch

A question that arises for us in this connection is which is the best model.

Our question is of course, why?

For us, the question arises whether this is really sufficient?

The question which now faces us is whether or not we can and should provide immediate aid.

I would like to give a thought to the officers and soldiers of my regiment, from the little town of Castres, who are suffering unprecedented humiliation.

Mr Klepsch said, and I quote: 'A month ago two more persons were released from cus­tody on health grounds and sent home under house arrest, namely Mr Augustin Jarquin and Miriam Arguello.'

The question for us now is whether the Union is capable of responding to this situation quickly and firmly and of assessing it appropriately.

The question for us therefore is whether or not Turkey can now be turned in the right direction with economic leverage.

Admittedly we want to give President Kabila in the Democratic Republic of the Congo a probationary period, but the question for us is whether it is being taken into account that only a clear change from a dictatorship to a democracy can be a reason for a generous remission of debt.

We must find an answer to the question of the extent to which public health is safeguarded from the effects of increased exposure to electromagnetic fields, because we do not have conclusive scientific evidence to establish the existence of any long-term harmful effects of these fields on our health.

However, in many countries worldwide the situation is very far from being satisfactory and the question put to us today is to know how the Union can do more.

This raises the question of how we handle human rights because Members will clearly have grave reservations when it comes to the admission to our treaty with ASEAN of Burma and, to a lesser extent or perhaps equally now, Cambodia.

Given this scenario, which we must counter, the issue we need to address today is what the position of the European Union and all the Member States will be; what position they will be adopting in the preparatory phase of the summit itself.

Even now, we are faced with the need for second-line treatments, for which no generics are yet available and the price of which is prohibitive, requiring renewed action on our part.

We would therefore question what practical added value EU ideas in this area can bring.

The question as to how to choose between cohesion or competitiveness, equality or efficiency has recently arisen.

Furthermore, one of the Commission proposals refers to combating terrorist propaganda and the question we are asking is where are the limits of freedom of opinion set and who will set them, politically and ideologically impartially, when today liberating movements are condemned and political parties are called terrorist organisations.

That brings us up against the question: what are we as a European Parliament doing to calm the situation down?

In view of this situation, we come up against the issue of guarantees of the rights of the peoples of Europe in the new superstate, since it has so far been the Member States that constituted these guarantees for their peoples.

We must also ask why so-called special categories of data are included, such as data providing information on sexual orientation, health, political and union activities, and religious belief.

What we need are achievements, practical plans with precise details of implementation and indications as to application.

When you compare this with what the Council intends to set aside for these energy conservation measures — a total of 150m EUA — we can only ask what our decision on the non-compulsory side of the budget is in fact worth.

With the threat from at least some of the Americans starting to recede, the big question now must be how did David manage to get Candida Colter thrown out of his room and then her room as well?

We also have questions surrounding Article 3(c) about where people should be returned to, and feel that, if the reference to 'other arrangements' includes the metaphorical handshakes that we have seen in the past between Mr Berlusconi and Gadafi, this is unacceptable as such accords are made outside of written public agreements.

DEFRAIGNE can give substance and importance to this demand that we are making in our capacity as the European Union.

Above all else, this means that the legal basis of the system within the single market must be reaffirmed by the Commission.

At present, in the light of the developments in the situation in Croatia, the Council has re-consulted the European Parliament on extending the PHARE programme to this country, and we hope that Parliament will be able to give us a favourable reply quickly.