Übersetzung für "Absatz gesetz" in Englisch

Specific exceptions to access restrictions detract in no way from any licensing requirements as defined under Section 19d of the Nature Conservation Act 1998, unless exceptions as defined under Section 19d, Subsection 2, of the Nature Conservation Act 1998 (projects or activities in accordance with the management plan) are applicable.

Access restrictions described above in Section 1 do not apply to the following activities on grounds of Section 20, Subsection 4 of the Nature Conservation Act 1998:

Access restrictions described above in Sections 1 to 3 do not apply to the following activities under Section 20, Subsection 4, of the Nature Conservation Act 1998:

Law No 151 of 19 March 1986, abolished and replaced by Statutory Notice No 700 of 1 September 1993, paragraph 15 (Personal Income Tax Act).

This law requires a smell to be added to fuel gas used for domestic purposes if it does not have a sufficiently strong smell and gives legal backing to the safety standards for materials, appliances and equipment fuel gas published by the Ente Nazionale di Unificazione (UNI) in the form of so-called UNI-CIG tables.

Law No 151 of 19 March 1986, abolished and replaced by Statutory Notice No 582 of 7 August 1991, paragraph 15 (Personal Income Tax Act).

These vehicles (four or more seats) are taxed at 50 % of the road tax applicable to private passenger cars (paragraph 2 of Article 22 of Law No 1473/1984 on amendments to direct and indi rect taxation and other provisions (Government Gazette 127, Part A).

In accordance with the general rules of jurisdiction, Croatian courts have international jurisdiction in cases where the defendant has his or her habitual residence in the Republic of Croatia (Article 46 paragraph 1 of the Private International Law Act).

Croatian courts also have international jurisdiction for disputes over matrimonial property if a defendant does not have his or her habitual residence in the Republic of Croatia but a plaintiff has his or her habitual or temporary residence in Croatia at the time of undertaking legal action (Article 59 paragraph 1 of the Private International Law Act).

Spouses may agree on the jurisdiction of Croatian courts if at least one of them is a Croatian national (Article 49 paragraph 2 of the Private International Law Act).

If the majority of the matrimonial property is located in the Republic of Croatia, and the rest is located abroad, the court can decide on the property that is located abroad only if it decides on the property located in the Republic of Croatia and only if the defendant agrees to this (Article 59 paragraph 2 of the Private International Law Act).

This solution is in conformity with recent developments in private international law: there is a similar provision in section 4(2) of the Dutch Act of 2001 and section 136(2) of the Swiss Act.

The proposal is based on Article 1, section 3, paragraph 3 of the Law.

The procedure under Article 15 paragraph 1 of the Act is reserved.

However, the provisions at the 3rd paragraph of article 22 of the Law are reserved.

More specifically,kticle 4(12) of Law No 2296196have spelt out such powers.

Entities operating pursuant to Article 10(3) of the Public Procurement Act (RT I 21.2.2007, 15, 76) and Article 14 of the Competition Act (RT I 2001, 56 332):

The scheme for granting State aid to firms that carried out investments in the municipalities affected by natural disasters in 2002 and listed in Article 5(e) of Decree-Law No 282 of 24 December 2002, which was converted into Law No 27 of 21 February 2003 and prolongs for certain firms the benefits provided for in Article 4(1) of Law No 383 of 18 October 2001, was unlawfully implemented by Italy in breach of Article 88(3) of the Treaty and is incompatible with the common market, without prejudice to Article 3.

As regards the comments of SIC on Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92, they responded that the Portuguese legislator did not grant public undertakings specific tax benefits in the event of business conversion or restructuring.

Secondly, the Commission agrees with the Portuguese authorities that Article 11(1) of Law No 21/92, on the basis of which RTP is exempt from payment of registration charges, does not confer a specific advantage.

Thirdly, the Commission agrees with the Portuguese authorities that Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92, under which RTP was exempted from the payment of other registration charges linked directly to the modification of the legal status of the company, does not confer a specific advantage to RTP.

Article 6(3) of Law No 39 provides also for aid to implement plans for the provision of electricity supplies and plans presented by municipalities for repairing roads serving holdings engaged primarily in cultivating bergamots, to improve access and encourage mechanisation.

According to Article 5(2) of the Act, the State will cover some of the company’s future pension obligations.

Article 6(4) of the Act concerns three items in the balance sheet of the company as in 31 December 1999: ‘tax-free reserves’, ‘special reserves’, and ‘amounts intended to increase the share capital’.

The Commission notes that Article 6(4) of the Act authorises the use of old losses for accounting purposes without any limitation in time.

However, the fact that Greece has repeatedly stated to the Commission that it commits to abolish Article 6(4) of the Act in its entirety, provides sufficient evidence that this measure should also be considered as State aid, which is incompatible with the common market.

With regard to the complainant’s claims on the calculation of the amounts of aid that could be granted under Article 6(4) of the Act [16], the Commission notes that these became devoid of purpose given that the present Decision orders the abolition of the this provision.

More particularly, to the extent that the benefits which could be granted to Hellenic Shipyards under Article 5(2) and Article 6(4) of the Act may also derive from other legal instruments, Greece should ensure that these are equally repealed and that, if aid was granted on their basis, it is recovered from the beneficiaries.

The Commission therefore closes the investigation procedure opened on 5 June 2002, in respect of the measures whereby Hellenic Shipyards is exempted from taxes, in accordance with Article 6(4) of the Act and where the State covers part of the future pension costs for employees linked to civil shipbuilding, in accordance with Article 5(2).

Article 5(e) of Decree-Law No 282 of 24 December 2002, converted into statute by Law No 27 of 21 February 2003, prolongs the benefits provided for in Article 4(1) of Law No 383 of 18 October 2001 solely for firms investing in municipalities seriously affected by natural disasters in 2002.

The legal basis for the exemption is Article 11(1) of Law No 21/92, which provides that:

Article 5(2) and Article 6(4) of Act 2941/2001 constitute State aid to Hellenic Shipyards AE which is incompatible with the common market.

Furthermore, under Article 11(2) of Law No 21/92, RTP was exempted from paying other registration fees directly linked to the modification of the legal nature of the company.

Entities operating pursuant to Article 10(3) of the Public Procurement Act (RT I 21.02.2007, 15, 76) and Article 14 of the Competition Act (RT I 2001, 56 332):