Translation of "Wissenschaftlicher nachweis" in English

There is absolutely no scientific evidence for this claim however.

Research studies providing scientific proof of these mechanisms has not yet been performed on human subjects.

For more details, please see tab "Scientific Evidence" 5.

Research studies providing scientific proof of these mechanisms has not yet been performed on human subjects.

There is no convincing scientific evidence of EMFs causing cancer.

High-quality evidence for the effectiveness of alternative medicine has not been found.

There is, however, still no scientific proof of hair re-growth. Main applications:

That means that the producer or importer of foodstuffs is only required to notify to a food agency that they use this or that claim without there being the need for scientific proof.

Due to lacking documentation, however, there is no scientific proof of age, particularly as there are no birth registers.

No convincing scientific evidence has been provided in the perspective of public health that the benefit of the fixed dose combination of oxycodone/naloxone in the treatment of idiopathic restless leg syndrome (IRLS) outweighs the expected adverse effects that are associated with the use of strongopioids in doses equipotent to doses up to 90 mg of oral morphine; dependence, withdrawal, augmentation, misuse and abuse.

However, this simplified procedure should be eligible only where no marketing authorisation under Directive 2001/83/EC, in particular due to lack of sufficient scientific literature demonstrating a well established medicinal use with recognised efficacy and an acceptable level of safety, can be obtained.

However, scientific evidence is still not available to demonstrate that nicotine occurs naturally in wild mushrooms and to elucidate its mechanism of formation.

This has been proven necessary because of a growing number of such claims, some of which are dubious due to a lack of clear scientific evidence to support these claims.

According to the "precautionary principle", action should be taken even if sound scientific proof of the danger is not available.

This criterion applies unless there exists additional scientific evidence concerning degradation and/or toxicity sufficient to provide an adequate assurance that neither the subsunce nor its degradation products will constitute a potential longterm and/or delayed danger to the aquatic environment.

Such additional scientific evidence should normally be based on the studies required at Level I (Annex VIII), c· studies of equivalent value, and could include :

Finally, the appendix is used as a first step in eliminating disorders included as diagnostic entities in the first edition because of tradition but for which sufficient evidence has still not been published.

Some experts are convinced of this method of treatment, but this is only a minority opinion. There is no unambiguous scientific proof of its efficacy.

They will also incorporate methods for modern information management into developing appropriate solutions for the worldwide digital provision of scientific collections.

No scientific proof for a causal correlation between the health complaints and the effects of low-frequency or high-frequency electromagnetic fields could be established yet.

Some experts are committed to this method of treatment. A doubtless scientific verification of the effectivity does not exist.

Numerous studies and observations have provided scientific proof of the effectiveness of BEMER Physical Vascular Therapy.

Bioavailabilty is around 40 times higher, as demonstrated in a human clinical study conducted by WACKER (please see tab "Scientific Evidence").

There is a demand for scientific evidence of effectiveness and for professional and methodological standards according to which the quality of counseling can be checked.

We currently assume that life may also exist on some extraterrestrial planets, but scientific evidence for this assumption is still pending.