Translation of "Verlagerung von arbeitsplätzen" in English

New technologies may lead to the loss or displacement

The main thing, however, is that labor displacement by machines is accelerating.

Such industries are beneficiaries of labor displacement from the goods-producing industries.

The relocation of jobs to Frankfurt is also likely to boost property demand.

The Marco Polo project ought not, therefore, to lead to employment in the EU being relocated.

The result has been a continuous transfer of jobs from industry to services.

Structural flexibility makes it equally easy for jobs to move elsewhere.

Structural flexibility makes it equally easy for jobs to move elsewhere.

This is another argument for examining moving activities to Eastern Europe, forexample, warns Agoria.

We are speaking here of legitimate support which may be granted in a certain number of regions.

In conclusion, labor displacement by machines will continue at a brisk pace into the future.

That, like it or not, is called "labor displacement".

Perhaps the effects of labor displacement might show up here rather than as unemployment?

One might wish that such interest were always shown when a workplace closes or moves, and perhaps especially when the reason for the closure has something to do with money from the EU Structural Funds.

Therefore, when balancing these interests, we must continue in future to consider whether higher CO2 emission reduction targets are feasible, whether they will help to retain jobs in 'old industries' and whether we can prevent these jobs from being moved elsewhere. One thing is clear.

The Union's declared aim of supporting the job transformation process does not take sufficient account of the additional danger of job relocation to third countries as a result of teleworking facilitated by the new information technologies.

First of all, most of the investment in Ireland is in entirely new projects and does not involve the relocation of jobs.

There are problems of waste and fraud - as I am sure the Commission will agree - there are problems with the improper allocation of funds, and there are problems with jobs being relocated rather than created.

At a time of rapid global population growth and, with that, a generally increasing need for resources, jobs moving to distant parts of the world and an economic crisis, I think that in the EU, we need more European timber rather than importing exotic timber from countries where it is difficult to control illegal logging and where we cannot control the corruption either.

I should like to ask you, Sir, through your good offices, to see whether you could get it put on to the agenda, because this could be a very important sector for the creation of growth, both in employment and economic terms, and would actually stop jobs leaving the European Union.

My second question to Commissioner Fischler relates to the answer previously given by the Commission to a question concerning the transfer of jobs in Bengtsfors in Dalsland to Portugal.

We therefore expect the Directorate-General for Competition, even before presenting the drafts for the regulation on the structural funds, to present its proposal for guidelines on regionally targeted aid, which should take due account of the parliamentary vote, for we must beware of narrowly focusing aid and support measures on the acceding countries, which would ultimately subsidise tax dumping in those countries and would only lead to job losses in the existing EU Member States as companies moved their production facilities from the West to the new Member States in the East.

We believe that this method would produce, or could produce, a relocation of jobs and economic activity within the European Union, which would create the greatest imbalance in the least competitive States, and would create a dangerous precedent within the CAP.

Besides the Solidarity Fund, the EU budget contains a Globalisation Fund, which may spend EUR 500 million every year to ease the social problems that result from job transfers.