Translation of "Strafrechtliche verfahren" in English

According to these Member States, this is why the national authorities prefer to use civil or criminal proceedings.

It can trigger both administrative and criminal proceedings.

Criminal proceedings may also be instigated.

Other measures include criminal proceedings or actions for injunctions and damages.

How you apply for free or subsidized legal information and advice, or aid in court, is set out for each country in Appendix 1, together with the basic rules of eligibility.

Furthermore, we reserve the right to initiate civil or criminal proceedings against you.

Unlike, perhaps, some of the more resistant Member States (the United Kingdom, the Netherlands since the last change of government, and so on), I am against limiting the scope to criminal procedures in the strictest sense;

We believe in the first instance that it is a good idea to supplement the OLAF scheme by setting up a unit under OLAF. This unit is to head investigations and ease prosecution proceedings in the national courts.

Such projects would bring together experts in crime prevention, computer security, criminal legislation and procedures, prosecution, investigative techniques and related matters and States seeking information or assistance in those areas.

In all cases, national provisions in respect of criminal proceedings and administrative penalties shall apply according to the normal procedures.

The Lisbon Treaty grants the EU competence both in the field of criminal procedure and substantive criminal law.

It is therefore appropriate to provide that unpremeditated or inadvertent infringements of the law that come to the attention of the authorities of the Members States solely through reporting pursuant to this Regulation should not be the subject of disciplinary, administrative or legal proceedings, unless where otherwise provided by applicable national criminal law.

At the same time, criminal proceedings provide often for stronger protection of the rights of the accused, reflecting the seriousness of the charge.

Where Member States have chosen to lay down criminal sanctions for the breaches of the provisions referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, they shall ensure that appropriate measures are in place so that competent authorities have all the necessary powers to liaise with judicial authorities within their jurisdiction to receive specific information related to criminal investigations or proceedings commenced for possible violations of Articles 4 and 15, and to provide the same to other competent authorities and ESMA to fulfil their obligation to cooperate with each other and, where relevant with ESMA for the purposes of paragraph 1 of this Article.

The United States' Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) – with 17 000 employees and a budget (in 2011) of USD 8.7 billion – even has powers to launch civil and criminal proceedings.

Where Member States have chosen to lay down criminal sanctions for the breaches of the provisions referred to in paragraph 1, they shall ensure that appropriate measures are in place so that a competent authority has all the necessary powers to liaise with judicial authorities within their jurisdiction to receive specific information related to criminal investigations or proceedings commenced for possible violations of Article 6 and for manipulating information to be submitted in accordance with 24(1), and to provide the same to other competent authorities and EBA to fulfil their obligation to cooperate with each other and, where relevant with EBA for the purposes of paragraph 1.

Nevertheless the Commission is clearly unable to intervene in the penal or civil procedures of the Member States which must themselves provide adequate national sanctions.

They also regretted that acts and omissions to be challenged do not include criminal matters.

These include the implementation of criminal procedures and criminal penalties, but there are still major disparities in the legal situation in the Community which do not allow the holders of intellectual property rights to benefit from an equivalent level of protection throughout the Community.

It will aim to increase protection of the euro by providing more efficient criminal legislation and procedures; and to a stronger monitoring of the EU rules in Member States.

In addition to serving as the court of final appeal for civil and criminal cases, it can also rule whether the Cabinet has acted in accordance with Norwegian law and whether the Parliament has passed legislation consistent with the Constitution.

It also notes that there are differences in the procedures applied, which can be either criminal or administrative, as well as in the level of fines, which, as in 2000, it does not consider to be a sufficient deterrent.