Translation of "Ob es sinn macht" in English

I'm not even sure it makes sense.

I don't care if it makes sense. Just give me something.

We'll decide if it makes sense to pursue.

Don't care who get hurt, what kind of sense it makes.

The murderer was the first mate whether it makes sense to you or not.

We sit down and talk about if it still makes sense.

The question is whether it makes sense in accordance with this principle to proceed.

However, the question is if there is any point to it.

Instead of saying they're, say they are to see if it makes sense.

Again and again, I have my doubts about whether or not it makes sense to write the IF blog.

It is unclear though, whether it makes any sense to look for one.

However, I am very sceptical about the value of constantly setting up new institutes at 'Community level' .

I would therefore ask the fundamental question of whether there really is any point continuing to waste billions of euro on these European parties.

Firstly there is the question of whether it is appropriate to establish at European Union level a numerical target for the reduction of the annual number of road deaths from the current awful level of 45 000 a year to a maximum of 25 000 by the year 2010.

No one thinks about the wisdom of pouring the dust through the sieve in the first place and quite simply the way to stop the dust being lost is to stop pouring.

With regard to the economic impact of interoperability, on the question of whether or not it makes sense to guarantee a single system in the future, an issue which in a sense Mr Vatanen also raised, I must say that, before proposing any decision on harmonised technical requirements, we must carry out a cost-benefit analysis which will justify the economic effort which will be required.

And this would mean that it will no longer be important to voters which party they vote for and some will wonder whether it is worth participating in elections at all.

The question in fact arises as to whether there is any sense, under these circumstances, in again entrusting the Commission with the drafting of a proposal.

This much must be stated very clearly here: if a ‘mopping-up’ transfer of EUR 142 million was made in 2004 – which amounts to almost 10% of Parliament’s budget – I start asking myself whether there is any point in continuing to draw up a budget for this House if this budget ends up taking a completely different course, and thus what was put forward by the budgetary authority – which is what we are in the case of Parliament’s budget, by virtue of the gentlemen’s agreement – ends up being disregarded.

The Committee questions the objective of devoting such a large proportion of the funding in both the Research and Development and the Demonstration allocation.

However, the Committee has serious doubts about the need to establish a "Community incident investigation team".

However, the Committee has serious doubts about the need to establish a "Community incident investigation team".

The Committee nonetheless does ask itself whether there is a case for keeping laws on the statute book - albeit on a temporary basis - on the sole grounds that they have yet to be replaced by measures which are more appropriate and accord better with the rules set out in the Treaties and secondary legislation.

When you are persecuted or when 'they visit' you in the early hours, you wonder if it's worthwhile to keep going.

And as regards the third group of amendments, the Commissioner must not forget that in part those amendments are based on points contained in the Treaties.

Comparing two groups of data would help us figure out if it’s worth it to try to organically rank for review-related keywords (or non-review related) keywords.