Translation of "Ist nicht zu beanstanden" in English

There are no constitutional objections to how the courts classified the statements as judgmental statements and statements of fact.

If someone holds heretical beliefs it is not objectionable.

This provision is not objectionable under constitutional law when properly interpreted and applied in the individual case.

Nor is there any objection to the way the features are apportioned between the first part and the characterising part of the claim.

The measure of risk stipulated by the Directive is in line with the Basle committee's recommendations.

According to the Court's case-law, national measures which restrict the exercise of fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty can be justified only if they fulfil four conditions: they must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner; they must be justified by overriding reasons based on the general interest; they must be suitable for securing the attainment of the objective which they pursue; and they must not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain that objective (see, in particular, Case C-55/94 Gebhard ? Consiglio dell'Ordine degli Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano; and Case C-212/97 Centros).

First, one cannot complain of an error of law in so far as the Court of First Instance reviewed the facts established by the Commission as to whether and to what extent it was evidence for or against market transparency.

The Council cannot be criticised for having taken into account, in implementing the second paragraph of Article 136 of the Treaty, the requirements of the common agricultural policy.

In those circumstances, the Commission cannot be criticised for having taken the view, at that stage of the proceedings, that Hoechst was not fully cooperating and that, accordingly, the previous acts of cooperation could, where appropriate, be considered insufficient in the context of the 1996 Leniency Notice.

Accordingly, the applicant cannot take issue with the Commission for basing its conclusions on the information gathered by the Member State concerned.

That being so, the Commission cannot be criticised for having awaited completion of the investigation conducted by the national authority before adopting its decision.

The Commission cannot therefore be criticised for having taken account of factors arising after the adoption of a plan to grant or alter aid.

In its fourth question, which the Court answered before the third question was considered, the national court asked whether Article 3 of Regulation No 3665/87 applies also in the circumstances referred to in Article 13 of that regulation, namely where the products exported are not 'of sound and fair marketable quality' and for that reason no refund may be granted.

How ever, the allocation of slots by a committee comprising user airlines is not in itself objectionable provided that membership of the committee is open to all airlines without discrimination.

Furthermore, the Directive aims to ensure compliance with the obligations incumbent on such a branch as a member of a deposit guarantee scheme. It follows from these various provisions that the effect of Article 4(2) is not to cause an excessive burden on the guarantee schemes of host Member States.

The downgrading of the share without a mandatory offer by the company or by its main shareholder that can be reviewed in valuation proceedings, which is at issue here, is also constitutionally unobjectionable.

The choice of the lowest 20 per cent of the single-person households stratified according to their net income after leaving out the recipients of social assistance as the reference group for ascertaining the standard benefit for a single is constitutionally unobjectionable.

The bib shorts fit well, the fit is unobjectionable — and here, the size fits, too.

Nor is there any objection on constitutional grounds to the Federal Court of Justice having rejected the complainant’s appeal without giving reasons.

The fact that the details of the proceedings are not provided for in the Second Book of the Code of Social Law itself is constitutionally unobjectionable.

There is no objection to the present version of the claims on formal grounds, since they are adequately supported by the specification as originally filed.

The opposite situation in which an independent claim includes features which do not seem essential for the performance of the invention is not objectionable.

It is thus constitutionally unobjectionable if the enterprises then also in principle bear the costs incurred by this.

The fact that the duration of these proceedings might exceed the term of the disputed collective agreement is not objectionable under constitutional law.

And even if this be allowed to carry it in its cover, it is not disliked, if there is not in the two hands which carry it, something polluting the mushaf, but it is disliked for the one who carries it, and he is not clean, in honour to the Qur'an and respect to it.

It does not therefore result in the loss of substantive rights.

The selection of the reference group according to whose expenditure the basic standard rate is assessed is constitutionally unobjectionable.

The prohibition intended by the North Rhine-Westphalian legislature under § 57 sec. 4 sentence 1 SchulG NW against expressions of religious belief made by way of the outer appearance and conduct of educational staff if those expressions are able to endanger or disturb the peace at school or the state’s neutrality, is constitutionally unobjectionable if the effect of the expression is sufficiently strong.

The Local Court’s and the Higher Regional Court’s interpretation of § 1598a BGB is not objectionable under constitutional law.