Translation of "Eintritt der rechtskraft" in English

Although not changing the date of the contested decision, this effect prevents it from having any legal consequences.

FINMA may also confiscate illegally generated profits or illegally avoided losses and may order publication of a final and binding ruling.

Consequently the appeal against a decision of the Community Patent Court preventing the res judicata effect should have a suspensory effect for the enforceability of the decision.

Since the appeal in cassa­tion presupposed the exhaustion of the ordinary means of appeal and had no suspensive effect, it did not affect the finality of the judgment.

Since the appeal in cas­sation presupposed the exhaustion of the ordinary means of appeal and had no sus­pensive effect, it did not affect the finality of the judgment.

If the decision is in favour of the third party, the proceedings may only be resumed after a period of three months of that decision becoming final unless the third party requests the resumption of the proceedings for grant.

The suspensive effect of an appeal deprives the contested decision of all legal effect until the appeal is decided.

Where a company is in serious breach of regulatory provisions, FINMA can publish part or all of its final rulings once they come into force.Â

The application shall be inadmissible if two years have elapsed since the decision entered into force and its execution has been effected.

This cannot change the date of the contested decision, but does prevent it from having legal effects.

FINMA can impose precautionary measures for the duration of proceedings and also after issuing a final ruling until the latter becomes legally binding.

The court action must be brought no later than six months following entry into final and binding force of the decision ending the proceedings, or following another manner of disposal of the proceedings.

If the decision is in favour of the third party, the proceedings may not be resumed earlier than three months after the decision has become final, unless the third party requests the resumption.

If an appeal against a board of appeal decision were to be deemed admissible, the new appeal would be subject to the same rules of procedure as the previous one and would therefore have suspensive effect, thus preventing the decision appealed against from having legal effects.

The power shall cease to apply if it is not put to use within three months after entry into final force of the judgment.

Once the approved plan takes legal effect, the entrepreneur Stefan Quandt will support SOLARWATT AG as it shifts its focus toward system solutions in his role as the new anchor investor.

Therefore a decision on the counter-claims after the decision of invalidity of the plaintiff's CTM has entered into legal force has no consequence whatsoever on the (former) trade mark owner.

Thus the board's conclusion is that the wording of Article 105 EPC does not satisfy the criteria set out in G 1/97 (supra) for a means of appeal which suspends or sets aside the formal res judicata effect of a board of appeal decision.

If more than six months have elapsed since the judgment entered into full force, he shall refrain from enforcement in full if that is apposite for supervisory reasons.

If the decision is in favour of the third party, the proceedings may only be resumed after a period of three months of that decision becoming final unless the third party requests the resumption of the opposition proceedings.

Article 61 lays down two main conditions, both of which have been fulfilled in the present case, namely: (i) a person adjudged to be entitled to the grant of a European patent must take action under Article 61 within a period of three months after the decision of the national court has become final; (ii) the European patent must not yet have been granted.

An appeal has suspensive effect, which means that the contested decision is not yet final (no formal res judicata) and its effects are suspended.