Translation of "Eingereichte klage" in English

The lawsuit against the university was settled out of court in 2013.

This case nevertheless triggered controversy within the Spanish judiciary.

Those applicants who have brought more than one action have been counted in respect of each action brought.

This bill would also nullify a lawsuit filed by local residents over the project's environmental impact report.

A date for the action, to be staged in Fort Lauderdale, has not yet been fixed.

Paragraph 4 of the motion for a legislative resolution calls on the Council to delay implementation of the financial measures contained in its proposal for a decision until the Court of Justice of the European Communities has given its verdict on the appeal lodged by several drift gillnet users against the regulation prohibiting them from using this piece of fishing equipment from the year 2002.

We must therefore bear in mind that when the Court has given its verdict on the appeal lodged, the majority of fishermen will have already ceased this type of activity and many will want to do so as soon as possible so as to promptly establish their new activities.

I would add that currently, in France, the mutual insurance associations are already reeling from an action brought by the European Commission against France before the European Court of Justice.

Is this stance on the part of the residents not enough reason to withdraw the case filed at the European Court of Justice?

The US complaint in the WTO against the European mechanism of repayable loans for the aviation sector is, in my view, unfounded and surprising.

Secondly, what initiatives does the Council intend to take in order to counter the absence of any punishment in this conflict, more particularly with regard to the complaint that has been lodged with the International Criminal Court in The Hague?

At the ministers" meeting there was also decided to reject the claim filed by the Chamber of Deputies, without entering into the discussion of the project, also in charge of the minister Sánchez Cordero.

Language: You should reply to the claim in the language of the court/tribunal which has sent you this form.

Therefore, the CFI declared that the action introduced by Sniace was inadmissible as the applicant was not individually concerned by the Commission decision.

In Sniace v Commission170, the ECJ also dismissed the appeal against the CFI judgment declared inadmissible the action initiated by Sniace against a Commission decision.

The interim measures now requested would prevent the works from going ahead until the Court has had time to rule on the case brought in March.

The Commission (DG IV) gave a provisional answer to the complaint on 18 November 1985, stating that investigation of the matter was not complete and that, as a result, the Directorate-General could not yet give a final ruling on the complaint.

However, these various agreements have not prevented the periodic recurrence of disputes concerning classification. For example, the Council brought a case against the 1995 budget on the grounds that Parliament had decided on expenditure which the Council considered compulsory and for which the Council alone was therefore responsible.

The action was brought by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in respect of Parliament's resolution of 7 July on the seat of the Community's institutions and is based essentially on Article 38 of the ECSC Treaty, and in the alternative on Articles 173 of the EEC Treaty and 146 of the Euratom Treaty.1

Others thought it preferable that the regions should be able to apply to the Court solely through an appeal submitted by the Committee of the Regions, the Member State concerned or even (in the view of some) by the second chamber of a national parliament.

The action was brought by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg in respect of Parliament's resolution of 7 July on the seat of the Community's institutions and is based essentially on Article 38 of the ECSC Treaty, and in the alternative on Articles 173 of the EEC Treaty and 146 of the Euratom Treaty.1

The Court rejected on 16 May the appeal lodged by Belgium against the Spanish regula­tion, with the support of Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland and the United Kingdom.

The appeal submitted recently by the employers to the federal constitutional court against the Co-determination Act is seen by the trade unions to indicate that the qualified right of co-determination accorded by law places in doubt the ability of employees to influence the process of humanization of work.

That meant that for the Koblenz proceedings it had to be established according to the Code of Civil Procedure (Zivilprozeßordnung [ZPO]) when the proceedings became pending, while the question of when the proceedings filed there by the defendant had definitely been commenced was to be decided according to Belgian procedural law.

When examining the possibility of lis alibi pendens under Article 21 of the Convention, the Oberlandesgericht left it open whether the proceedings brought in Bari had been in­stituted before the action brought in Germany (which turned on service in Italian law), since there was no identity of subject­matter, namely the same facts and the same claims, as was required under Article 21.