Translation of "Volcker rule" in German

There are already a number of models for this, such as the Vickers Rule and the Volcker Rule.

The Volcker rule (named for former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker) provoked similar arguments.

To this end, there are already a number of models such as the Vickers model and the Volcker-Rule.

The “Volcker rule,” whereby commercial banks would be barred from trading on their own account, and from owning hedge funds and private-equity firms, languishes in Congress.

And plans by the EU and the United Kingdom to “ring-fence” bank deposits are poised to depart in form and substance from one another and from the newly unveiled Volcker rule in the US.

On the critical dimension of excessive bank size and what it implies for systemic risk, there was a concerted effort by Senators Ted Kaufman and Sherrod Brown to impose a size cap on the largest banks – very much in accordance with the spirit of the original “Volcker Rule” proposed in January 2010 by Obama himself.

As Haldane notes, even the celebrated “Volcker rule,” intended to build a better wall between more mundane commercial banking and riskier proprietary bank trading, has been hugely watered down as it grinds through the legislative process.

Aside from its implementation difficulties, there are good reasons not to introduce the Volcker rule, rather than the ICB/Liikanen proposals, in the UK and Europe.

This suggests that a better question is whether to introduce the Volcker rule in addition to, rather than instead of, ring-fencing.

There was no sign of the more radical ideas that emerged later in the debate, such as the so-called Volcker rule separating banks and hedge funds (which is reflected in the US legislation), or a crisis-resolution mechanism whereby bank debt is converted semi-automatically into equity (which several countries are considering).

Even in the wake of the financial crisis that erupted in 2008, they trip off the word processors of a hundred submissions challenging the so-called Volcker rule (which would bar banks from making proprietary investments).

The US now has its Volcker rule (though disputes between banks and regulators about just how to define it continue).

In the United States, policymakers chose to include the Volcker rule (named after former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker) in the Dodd-Frank Act, thereby restricting proprietary trading by commercial banks rather than reviving some form of the Glass-Steagall Act’s division of investment and retail banks.

A strong version of the so-called Volcker Rule (designed to force government-insured banks to return to their core mission of lending) might work.

The United States has recently adopted the so-called "Volcker rule" prohibiting proprietary trading by banks.

Unlike their cousin the Volcker Rule, neither Liikanen nor the UK approach attempts to draw a line between types of trading.

In the U.S., the Volcker Rule against speculative investments and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act secured the backdrop for the financial sector to play its critical facilitating role during the recovery.

Furthermore, due to new government regulations (Basel III, Volcker Rule), the team expects a sizeable risk transfer in this asset class over the next few years.

Will the Volcker Rule in the US or banking union in Europe bring about significant improvements in banking trustworthiness?

Even the mainstream press, however, appears to have appreciated that the detailed Volcker rule does not match the rhetoric.

The USA has already taken this to task with its Volcker-Rule in the framework of a big financial market reform.

This is one of the reasons why policymakers in both the United States and in Europe have drawn up, and in some cases already implemented, reform options such as the Volcker Rule (United States), the Vickers Report (United Kingdom) and the Liikanen Report (European Union) to restrict proprietary trading by banks.

In addition, there is a need to implement proposals to completely separate risky investment banking from banking which serves the real economy, along the lines of proposals in the US (Volcker rule) and the UK (Vickers Commission).

But, there are also those, especially in the United States and Great Britain who argue that a partial bank separation were better, including the British Vickers Commission's proposal for ring-fencing – for separate departments within the same bank, or those who favor the weak Volcker-Rule for the U.S. We, however, believe that only full bank separation would protect the population from the excesses of the speculators.

Continental European countries like big banks, and therefore will never go along with the Volcker rules, he wrote.

Unsurprisingly, Goldman Sachs and other Wall Street firms are dubious about the “Volcker rules.”