Übersetzung für "Jurisdiction agreement" in Deutsch

The jurisdiction agreement contained therein satisfied the formal requirements of Article 17 of the Convention.

The jurisdiction agreement is not therefore ineffective, because the service contract is invalid.

The jurisdiction agreement is effective after the gewähl th Liechtenstein law.

The jurisdiction agreement also applies to legal proceedings concerning checks and bills of exchange.

The jurisdiction conferred by agreement shall be exclusive unless the parties have agreed otherwise.

The Landgericht declined jurisdiction on the ground that the jurisdiction agreement was void.

There was no jurisdiction agreement between the parties within the meaning of Article 17 of the Convention.

The jurisdiction agreement was not concluded for the benefit of the plaintiff alone.

The jurisdiction agreement had not been reached effectively, because the required writing was not ge-preserving.

The jurisdiction agreement shall also apply for customers who do not have a general place of jurisdiction in Germany.

Without prejudice to Article 26, where a court of a Member State on which an agreement as referred to in Article 25 confers exclusive jurisdiction is seised, any court of another Member State shall stay the proceedings until such time as the court seised on the basis of the agreement declares that it has no jurisdiction under the agreement.

If the parties, regardless of their domicile, have agreed that a court or the courts of a Member State are to have jurisdiction to settle any disputes which have arisen or which may arise in connection with a particular legal relationship, that court or those courts shall have jurisdiction, unless the agreement is null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of that Member State.

National regulations which place restrictions on the international jurisdiction agreement are therefore in principle meaningless as far as distance learning is concerned.

In the final analysis, then, questions to do with the international jurisdiction agreement in the single market are covered by the Brussels Convention for distance learning.

By its second question, the national court seeks in essence to establish whether Article 21 of the Brussels Convention must be interpreted as meaning that, where a court is the second court seised and has exclusive jurisdiction under an agreement conferring jurisdiction, it may, by way of derogation from that article, give judgment in the case without waiting for a declaration from the court first seised that it has no jurisdiction.

The question whether, in the light of Arti­cle 17 of the Convention, an exclusive distributor could still bring an action in Belgium under the Belgian law contrary to a validly concluded jurisdiction agreement, could only be relevant for a Belgian court in which proceedings had been brought under that Law.

Under the jurisdiction agreement con­tained in the contract, which was valid under Article 17 of the Brussels Convention, the courts in Lille had exclusive jurisdiction to entertain the action.

The Landgericht declined jurisdiction on the ground that the jurisdiction agreement on the basis of which the action had been brought did not comply with the requirements laid down in the second paragraph of Article I of the Protocol to the Brussels Convention.

The court observed that Article I of the Protocol of 27 September 1968 allowed a defendant domiciled in Luxembourg to re­fuse to submit to the jurisdiction of a court in which proceedings were commenced un­der Article 5(1) of the Convention, unless he had expressly and specifically entered into a jurisdiction agreement within the meaning of Article 17.

After establishing that the defendant had not entered an appearance, the court addressed itself to the question whether a jurisdiction agreement satisfying the re­quirements laid down by Article 17 of the Convention had been concluded between the parties.