Übersetzung für "An der ein oder anderen stelle" in Englisch

At some points there is still room for optimization.

Should there be delays in reaching us in one or the other situation, we ask for your patience.

In summary and as a constructive access of our approach for RLP, it can be said that, in one quarter or other at least, market, industrial and corporate-induced “start-up ecosystems” are conceivable in the short term, but the actual constructive use of such systems does not develop until they are extended to “entrepreneur ecosystems” or SMI ecosystems. In other words, they can be developed by supporting the strengths on a regional basis using “onion-skin” models and building them up in various surrounding layers, creating benefits for municipalities or the region.

We continue to walk with a high level of concentration, as yes, the Via Bregaglia is still signposted on the Italian side, but in one or the other place you need to look around well to avoid missing the signs.

It is time to make diesel systems more efficient and to convert to photovoltaic power in some areas.

At one point or another, the term “SuperApp” is mixed under publications.

Some of the points of interest have changed, but the idea remains the same.

The apartment is pretty and has Italian flair, however she could again use a painting where the one or the other.

In conclusion, may we add that the bill will certainly still be influenced at one place or another during the course of the ongoing legislative procedure by the current political discussions on temporary agency work.

At certain moments in the book, we wondered whether this book was actually aimed at the reader (the parents) or the listener (the children).

At one point or another, the scope is already being significantly expanded and the range of services offered by former classic retailers is being supplemented by further financial services in addition to payment.

That is why we set up reserves in various areas.

We could have wished for something more on one or two points.

I mentioned the most of them already in the other chapters.

Here and there perhaps, we must be a bit more ambitious.

We have also agreed to compromise on one or two points, because you can never have everything in a House such as this.

We may have different opinions here on one or two points, but if we as Europeans are divided in what we say there, we will not be considered credible, and if we are not credible other people will not follow us.

Obviously, I therefore do understand the odd complaint from the Member States here or there about bureaucratic processes in the mutual evaluation - as Mrs Gebhardt made reference to.

If Turkey cannot move forward with its internal democratic constitution, I believe that we will still have serious problems in some areas, quite apart from the deadlock in the Council.

They are simply intended to amplify certain areas and make some points even more explicit.

I would be happy if we did not lose sight of this point of view during the coming weeks and months, and especially during the negotiations, so that not just the legitimate wishes of the governments are addressed, but also, at one point or another, our legitimate demands are upheld, and that we represent the legitimate demands of the people from these countries.

I also believe that at some points the Commission could have submitted proposals which offered more of a balance between the position of the Council and that of Parliament.

Certainly you would have liked to see better results in one or other respect, as we would too, but it is our joint understanding that we have now gone as far as we could and really do want to transpose this into concrete legislative acts.

These are the main parties involved; they must be the ones to drive innovation in Europe, and we placed them in the foreground by removing many sometimes obviously bureaucratic obstructions, for instance through a new Vademecum.

I sometimes feel that at one point or another we are demanding of the candidate countries something that the Member States are not doing themselves.

There has been much discussion today about your proposals, Commissioner, but, if I have understood you correctly, there are one or two places where you have allowed for a certain readiness to compromise, and this affects decoupling.

I would like to thank all the Members of the House who have contributed helpful proposals, suggestions, or criticisms to this or that aspect of this report, enabling us, overall, to come to a result with which we, together in this House, will be able to take a positive decision.

We did not make life easy for ourselves, because every compromise inevitably has some aspect here or there where there might be some scope for improvement.

However, even though there may be certain difficulties, problems or delays here and there, it seems to me, according to my personal assessment of the state of the negotiations, that these are progressing at a good rate.

I would have liked to see more progress in certain areas of this whole project.

For my own part, I am ready to endorse the compromise prepared by the PPE-DE Group in the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy, according to which we shall comply with the Commission' s proposal except with regard to the area of ammonia emissions, as the proposal will not cause great problems for my own country, Finland, or our neighbour, Sweden, as has become evident on many occasions in this discussion.

Though members are not expected to follow the lead of any religious authority, all the high priests have publicly expressed their personal beliefs at one point or another.

We should welcome this. The interchange of knowledge and culture enriches the lives of us all.

For the Community, and allowing for bilateral aid, this corresponds to a certain figure which we had written into the preliminary draft budget.

Here the transit countries of Austria and Switzerland, with their heavy responsibilities, are naturally of special importance, I fail to understand how the Council of Ministers still has not realised that we must quickly reach transit agreements with these countries which are also socially acceptable to the people there.

Finally, Mr President, there is considerable readiness on my own part and on that of the EPP Group to reflect on difficult points, difficult changes — Council presidency, composition of the Commission and also the language setup — but where that last point is concerned, let us be hyper-careful. Language is the heart of a people's identity, and let us not forget that the shock waves following Maastricht were in many cases caused by fear of loss of identity.

I myself do not think that this is a very desirable development, but introducing transparency could at least help to restrict such practices.