Translation of "Quelle zitieren" in English

I'll just refer to you as sources say.

The best you can do is quote statistics from a reputable source.

Please note that you are required to cite the source correctly when you publish a paper.

It is also necessary to cite the other source in its entirety.

And to back up my arguments, I should like to quote an authority which, I imagine, is unimpeachable — the Atlantic Council. In last month's Atlantic News, No 1559, the Council expressed very serious doubts as to the European Parliament's powers in the matter of defence.

To cite a reference in a TeX document, you insert the BibTeX key for the reference in the correct place in the document.

Now I would like to cite at least one pagan source – and it is not the only one that could be cited.

An author only has to fail to quote the source from which he has taken one or another passage, may it be intentionally or unintentionally.

If you quote this website as source you are free to use any or all of its content under two conditions:

For commercial uses, quotations, as well for further publication written permission must be obtained via the mail address mentioned at the end of this site, and this site quoted as the source.

If you want to use parts of the information on this website, you must quote the source (§§ 51, 63 Urheberrechtsgesetz).

You can also specify that a reference should only appear in the text but not in the bibliography (/nobib).

Just for the record, then, I would offer the following examples, quoting directly from the source:

Name your sources when you quote or refer to other Internet pages.

Should the exposée quote the sources used?

Why does he think it better not to cite sources?

They are acquainted with empirical methods and can correctly cite sources.

Variables and other terms used must be clearly defined, sources quoted and any classification sys­tem made clear.

If you want to write something authoritative, then you had better cite your data sources.

This explains why my conception of debate requires that the participants cite relevant sources.

To redeem his view he would need to cite the scholarly sources that support it.

All you can do is to quote other sources, without being able to really check the facts!

Articles should cite authoritative sources.

Unfortunately she did not pretend to be exhaustive: source I quote in the introduction is absent.

I could go on at length quoting and referring to different sources indicating the difficulties for China, but I think these examples suffice.

It denies, collectively, the right to quote from credible sources and debate on the facts and interpretations, which represents the very basis of intellectual work.

How can you quote correctly from different sources without getting penalized for duplicated content?

But now that is passed to really serious talk, we can only bow our heads and give her reason, because she cites incontrovertible sources, for instance:

Because the Pali Canon is such an unpromising place to look for the justification of killing, most of the arguments for a Buddhist theory of just war look elsewhere for their evidence, citing the words and behavior of people they take as surrogates for the Buddha.

Meyerhoff can quote his sources and I can quote my sources, he can discredit mine and I can discredit his – tit for tat.

A number of sources quote his belief that the earth is at the centre of the universe but that it rotates on its axis once a day.

Against this large number of quotations from the OT can not be quoted by NT writers from non-canonical Jewish sources (see Ryle, 'Apocrypha' in Smith's DB 2, Zahn, Com.