Translation of "Nicht mehr berücksichtigen" in English

We may not be able to accept late applications to visit in busy weeks.

Later complaints cannot be taken into consideration.

The Commission may decide not to take into account the observations conveyed after the deadline.

The user need no longer take into account errors which may occur and can make the input directly in spatial coordinates.

I am not absolutely sure that I can accept what I read in the newspapers as a record of what happened.

Admittedly, in calculating their rates, the undertakings may no longer take the lapse rates into consideration in reduction of premiums.

As we need some time for promotion and presales, we can't consider later applications.

Unfortunately, that will be too late for the Council to have the chance to take it into account.

It appears, however, that the new French Government has received a mandate from President Chirac, even though he is one of the signatories to the Barcelona agreements, no longer to observe this objective of a budgetary position close-to-balance-or-in-surplus by 2004.

Countries permitting their population to vote 'no' will no longer be paid any attention.

This is then sold to us under the Lisbon banner by saying that we no longer can or must take anything growth-intensive into account in the procedure from now on.

However, in determining normal value the Commission accepted to exclude certain amounts of SG and A expenses which were shown not to relate to domestic sales of the product concerned.

This recent Commission suggestion cannot be considered by the EESC at this late stage of its deliberations.

The Commission, therefore, decided that it could not consider the revised 'package' of undertakings.

It is clear from those points mentioned by the Court of First Instance that the fact that the Commission has issued a comfort letter cannot mean that it is no longer entitled to take account of a factual situation which existed before the letter was sent but was brought to its notice only later, particularly in connection with a complaint lodged at a later stage.

In particular, both are only addressed to a limited number of railway undertakings one of which no longer exists, and neither reflect the accounting separation required in Directive 91/440/EEC, nor the fact that in many Member States that there is a separation of the function of Infrastructure Management from Railway undertakings.

It would no longer be necessary to consider other national mandatory provisions as they would normally have to when concluding a contract with a consumer from another Member State.

A comparison of the individual slope values with the average slope value permits, for example, to exclude slope values which exceed the average slope value by a predetermined extent and thus need not be further considered.

This has the advantage that long signal delay times caused by generally long address buses are no longer an issue for decoding by the column decoder if the first and the second clock signal are synchronized such that the corresponding column addresses have already been transferred to the column decoder via the address buses.

The automatic determination of the position of the catheter 9, as enabled by the proposed system, also makes it possible to isolate a sub-region from the scanned volume so as to ignore edge regions that are not of interest in subsequent ultrasound images.

Nonetheless because of the speed at which our Parliament works and the developments taking place in the world, this report is inevitably somewhat dated. I wish to pick out one point to show clearly, how this report has not been able — or perhaps did not wish — to take into account the developments taking place.

Applications received after 30 June 1994 for loans under the second paragraph of Article 54 will no longer be considered by the Commission with the exception of those concerning large in­frastructure projects which present a particular Community interest and satisfy certain condi­tions.

It is common ground that, since the EEC/San Marino Agreement entered into force on 1 December 1992, it is not applicable to the present case.

According to the Court of First Instance, the peremptory nature of this time limit meant that the OHIM could not take account of any evidence that was submitted late.

If it were the case that the first-instance department's internal decision-making process is completed on the date its members sign the decision - a date not known to the parties involved - the result would be pointless appeals because the first instance would no longer be able to take account of important developments affecting the decision which occurred after this date, even though the decision had not yet left its hands.

If you require the return of any unused original or pretreated excess sample materials, your request MUST be made in writing in one of the following ways (we may not be able to honor later requests):