Translation of "Es ist nicht verständlich" in English

I do not quite understand what is so problematic about it.

I do not see why Mrs Randzio-Plath needs any further evidence.

It is fair to contemplate the meaning of our existence. Is it not?

It is not understandable to you that there is no cause.

It’s understandable not to like the HCG diet recipe.

It may not be easy to understand, but it's VERY PROFOUNDLY true.

If one party does not keep to an agreement, is it not natural for the other party to cancel the agreement, since the agreement concerns mutual obligations?

So I cannot understand why Parliament has not followed an early Commission proposal.

But it is difficult to understand why these controls are not carried out so intensely on ships belonging to nonCommunity countries which have signed the Convention.

This assessment was somewhat tempered subsequently by Pascal Lamy, but it was still not very clear what means he would use in order to control globalisation without demanding radical change in the rules of the game, particularly by means of the introduction of the idea of social or environmental cost into international negotiations.

I fail to understand why we still need to abide by this regulation and why the United States are forcing us into something here or not letting us change something that should have been changed a long time ago, because it is unfair that petrol for cars, transportation systems and so forth should be taxed, while aviation fuel is not.

I cannot understand why people are trying to table various draft amendments that weaken the report and are simply dismissing UN documents that are on hand.

It is incomprehensible why the EU is unnecessarily risking dividing the EU on this.

In Germany, Great Britain, Finland and other countries where something has already been done, it is quite simply incomprehensible that one should be penalised for having already made a start on protecting the climate.

This makes it incomprehensible that there should be so little awareness on the part of certain elements in the Council, comparable to their ignorance of the promotion of electricity generation from renewable energy sources.

I do not understand how the Commission can say it is able to authorise this centrally, and has the competence to do so, when it does not know the answers to the questions raised by coexistence.

The reason for deleting Article 5, point 1(b) of Directive 91/628/EEC is not clear.

Isn't it natural, with so little... love and understanding from my husband... that I'd turn to someone else?

Is it strange, therefore, that several members should have signed a question addressed to the Commission aimed at finding out what has been going on all this time ?

Secondly, we are particularly concerned about developments in the Sudan, and we should like the Com munity to make a very special additional effort.

When we see that even the modest proposals this Parliament made, for example, in the Hänsch report, which was adopted in 1981 — listen carefully, Mr President: 1981! — have still not been accepted, we realize that the songs of joy which the Council and the governments of our Member States sing about the new European Act sound very false.

In fact the inaccurate and misleading reporting which appears occasionally in the national press, submitted by Parliament Members who are not committee members, can politicise a committee that is endeavouring to be fair and impartial.

Excessive concentration on the hereditary aspects may also lead to the suggestion that living conditions in society do not need to be changed, but that man must be adjusted to these conditions.

I cannot understand why the Council and the Commission are not prepared to accept the United States' Act, which was passed in 1978 and with which we have long been familiar.

Isn't it expected that this warm, wonderful, wise people, who have given the world so much but have been tormented so much by the haters, isn't it understandable that they would yearn for a golem or a superman to save them?