Translation of "Erkennendes gericht" in English

You don't recognize the authority of this court at all, do you?

AND HE'S NOT THE FIRST ONE FORCED TO COMMIT CRIMES

The court was not bound by the decision of the Italian court.

The court was not bound by the decision of the Italian court.

Basically any trial court will verify whether it actually has jurisdiction under the rules of international jurisdiction.

I've committed no crime and I do not concede to this court or the Cardassian empire!

The same goes for ‘judicial authorities’, which in English means judges who pass judgment, whereas in Italian, it can also refer to investigating judges.

We should therefore clarify whether we are also conferring powers of investigating judges, which I hope is not the case, or only powers of adjudicating judges.

Courts take the evidence and then evaluate on the bases that by looking to the evidence whether a particular fact is proved or not.

Day release, electronic surveillance and enforcement in instalments (weekend detention), can be decided in certain Member States not only ab initio by the sentencing court but also subsequently by the enforcement authority.

The possibilities for review of decisions by the committal review court would be those provided for by domestic law under the options for a national court or those for Community actions under the option of a Community Pre?Trial Chamber, as the case may be.

Settling this question would also facilitate the subsequent decision who is to present the prosecution case in the trial court.

In particular, if the national committal review court had jurisdiction to review manifest errors in the European Public Prosecutor’s choice of forum, the Court of Justice should be available to hear actions by the European Public Prosecutor in the event of jurisdiction being declined or of negative conflicts of jurisdiction subject to the principle of cases being concluded within a reasonable period of time.

This measure, which is described in detail above, can be decided not only ab initio by the sentencing court but also sometimes at a later date by the enforcement authority.219

It is in writing and signed by myself on behalf of many of the diverse constituents especially those in the 9th Congressional District and all American voters who recognize that the Supreme Court not the people of the United States, decided this election.

An expert witness may or may not also be a percipient witness, as in a doctor or may or may not have treated the victim of an accident or crime.

Although a court faced with such a justification might recognise t hat the justifications are themselves grounded in racial stereotypes, the case-law in other jurisdictions, such as the E C t H R Ostrava decision above, suggests otherwise.

It follows that the statement of reasons enabled the applicant to ascertain the reasons why Imarflex's data were not used as a basis for calculating the constructed normal value and enabled the Court to exercise its power of review.

The applicant was thus in a position to know the justification for the contested measure and the Court of First Instance is in a position to exercise its power to review the legality of that decision.

But in cases of doubt the court is not allowed to assume that the ECJ would arrive at the same result as the court itself and therefore to decline to make a reference.