Übersetzung für "Wille der parteien" in Englisch

This Declaration will underline the parties's will to strengthen their relationship and cooperation.

In order to ensure transparency and equal treatment, amendments to the provisions of a contract during its term should be considered to constitute a new award of a contract when they render the contract materially different in character from the original contract and, therefore, such as to demonstrate the intention of the parties to renegotiate the essential terms of that contract.

In this regard, the EESC points out that in all Member State systems the criterion for determining the taxable amount is largely based on the parties' willingness to negotiate and aims to ensure that the actual consideration is taxed given that the taxable amount is generally the contractual consideration agreed on for the goods or service rendered.

If the final agreement does not reflect the real wishes of the parties, that is, the actual compromise which the parties are willing to accept, with all that this implies in terms of waiver of their original wishes, ADR mechanism has not achieved its primary objectives, i.e. the genuine resolution of the dispute and the social pacification that ensues.

The Council took note with satisfaction of the fact that the first negotiation meetings had been held in a spirit of cooperation, expressing the will of both parties to make progress in the definition of a new global EU-ACP agreement.

It can be seen from the cases that the Court's reasoning prefers the ideological, systematic approach rather than the strictly­literal approach based on the intention of the legislative. This is because of the particular features of treaties designed to achieve a form of integration.

The debales highlighted lhe importance of existing cooperation between the Community and Syria and the will of both parties to strengthen their cooperation in the future.

If parties clearly intended to make a reference to something other than the official ECU, e.g. a permanently fixed basket, then the will of the parties prevails.

According to the case­law of the Court of Justice, that provision had to be interpreted in a manner which complied with the declared common intention of the parties.

The common intention to confer an advantage on one of the parties must therefore be clear from the terms of the jurisdiction clause or from all the evidence to be found therein or from the circumstances in which the contract was concluded.

The appellant had relied on the judgment of the Court of Justice in Case 22/85 Anterist ? Crédit Lyonnais (supra, 1­17.3 — A 1), under which the nomination of the court of a State in which one party is resident or has its registered office is not sufficient by itself to prove that the parties intended to benefit one particular party.

For this reason, Parliament should request the Council, by an overwhelming majority, to agree to both of the amendments. Perhaps the Commission may still be able to convince the Council, because our objective, in trying to ensure that Member States are under an obligation to inspect passing vessels as well, is that our common system of port State control should provide both human beings and the environment with the greatest possible preventive protection against shipping disasters.

These differences reflect the intentions of the authors of the Treaties and the historical context in which they were drawn up. '

In the first place, no common intention to benefit one of the parties could be inferred from the words of the disputed clause.

In that regard, the Court also recalled that, in the absence of Community rules governing the matter, it is for the domestic legal system of each Member State to determine the detailed rules governing the exercise of that right, including those on the application of the concept of ‘causal relationship’, provided that those rules are not less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (principle of equivalence) and that they do not render practically impossible or excessively dicult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law (principle of eectiveness).

Force majeure means: each of the will of the parties independent, or any unforeseeable circumstance as a result of which fulfillment of the agreement is no longer reasonably possible or can no longer reasonably be demanded of the supplier by the other party.

It is the express wish of the parties that this severability clause does not result in a mere reversal of the burden of proof but that the provisions of Section 139 of the German Civil Code (BGB) as a whole be waived.

The important experiment happens against the will of the participating parties relatively in a secret, as the modells of the Solaris Urbino are counted as a familiar spectacle on the airport.

Any circumstance which does not depend on the will of the parties, which happens after concluding the agreement and which hinders the execution of the agreement is considered to be a Force Majeure Case and exonerates the party who invokes it from its obligation to comply with its responsibility.

Obviously, legislation is no substitute for the political will of the parties.

Thus they trampled upon the will of the Party once again.

None of us desires or is able to dispute the will of the party.

Gaps in the contract have to be concluded from this contract according to the presumed intention of the parties.

The CCP, however, only recognises the Party's will, not conscience.

LXXI. The law settles the rules of the procedure in a dispositive manner enabling the wishes of the parties.

Such an {interim} agreement will be immediately effective when such is the desire of all parties.

Invalid provisions are to be reworded in accordance with the parties’ assumed will with consideration given to legal requirements.

I trust in the willingness of the various parties to cooperate, and I hope that the fruitful patterns of cooperation with the European Parliament will continue.

Political rights and local elections may be at the mercy of the Party, but the historical memory of millions of people will not so easily be erased.

The 1980 Vienna Convention on contracts for the international sale of goods (CISG) offers a supplementary framework in a legal situation which is dominated by the "will of the parties" (which in practice can express the interplay of market forces).

Any challenge to the admissibility, in whole or in part, of the appeal must be included in the actual body of the response, since the possibility — provided for in Article 130 of the Rules of Procedure — of raising a plea of inadmissibility in relation to the proceedings by a separate document is not applicable to appeals.

A contract is to be interpreted according to the common intention of the parties even if this differs from the normal meaning of the expressions used in it.

Mediation should not be regarded as a poorer alternative to judicial proceedings in the sense that settlement agreements are dependant on the good will of the parties for their enforcement.

Some respondents who consider practices as not effective are of the opinion that all agreements resulting from mediation should be enforceable regardless of the will of the parties.

Mediation should not be regarded as a poorer alternative to judicial proceedings in the sense that compliance with agreements resulting from mediation would depend on the good will of the parties.

In contrast, the relations of the State with the insolvent firm are based on public law and therefore are not dependent on the will of the parties.

Where establishing the existence of the agreement, the court has to respect the intentions of the parties.

However, the Commission considers that this does not apply in the case of notaries as they cannot impose a decision against the will of one of the parties they are advising.

This adviser tries to mediate between consumers and retailers, but can never settle a dispute against the wishes of one of the parties.

Alternatively such a restriction in scope may leave the applicability of the directive in the hands of the parties, who could introduce cross-border elements through their choice of mediator or court for the dispute in order to benefit from the rules laid down by the directive.

Finally, it would be ensured that throughout the Union, maximum effect is given to the will of the parties which enhances their freedom to contract and freedom to conduct a business as guaranteed in Article 16 of the Charter.

Those which do not arise from the wishes of the parties and have not received the approval of a public authority (for example a judge or a notary) could not benefit from these rules.

The effectiveness of arbitration agreements should also be improved in order to give full effect to the will of the parties.

The political will of the parties in this initial phase is essential in order to pave the way for a start on joint work, free of obstacles.