Übersetzung für "Rechtskräftiges urteil" in Englisch

However, these proceedings are still going-on and a final judgement has not been rendered in either case.

What is a final judgment (final payment order)?

Any decision or award may be enforced as a final judgment by any court of competent jurisdiction.

A W3 warning shall remain active until a judgment having the force of res judicata is rendered or the case has been otherwise settled.

In the lawsuit no final judgment has been pronounced.For more information, go to FAQ.

A requested authority may decide not to comply with the obligations referred to in Article 7 if criminal investigations or judicial proceedings have already been initiated or final judgment has already been passed in respect of the same intra-Community infringements and against the same sellers or suppliers before the judicial authorities in the Member State of the requested or applicant authority.

However, according to a subsequent court ruling, work can continue on the project pending a final ruling.

Furthermore, it makes the whole system superfluous as once a final judicial decision is taken, there is no reason to apply the provisional flatrate solution of sharing the financial burden between Member States and the Community budget.

The competent authorities may refuse to act on a request for an investigation to be conducted as provided for in the first subparagraph, or on a request for its personnel to be accompanied by personnel of the competent authority of another Member State as provided for in the second subparagraph, where such an investigation might adversely affect the sovereignty, security or public policy of the State addressed, or where judicial proceedings have already been initiated in respect of the same actions and against the same persons before the authorities of the State addressed or where a final judgment has already been delivered in relation to such persons for the same actions in the State addressed.

In cases of fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the Union's financial interests which are not yet subject to a final judgment, the authorising officer responsible and the panel should be given the possibility to defer the opportunity given to the person of entity to submit its observations.

The Community design court hearing an action for infringement or threatened infringement on the basis of a Community design shall reject the action if a final judgement on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of a design right providing simultaneous protection.

In cases of fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the financial interests of the Union which are not yet subject to a final judgment, it should be possible for the authorising officer responsible to defer the notification of the person or entity and for the panel to defer the right of the person or entity to submit its observations.

In cases of fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity affecting the Union's financial interests which are not yet subject to a final judgment, the contracting authority and the panel should be given the possibility to defer the opportunity given to the economic operator to submit its observations.

Where a decision of a Board of Appeal on a case has been annulled or altered by a final ruling of the General Court or, as the case may be, of the Court of Justice, the President of the Boards of Appeal shall, with a view to complying with that ruling in accordance with Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, reallocate the case pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Article to a Board of Appeal, which shall not comprise those members who had adopted the annulled decision, except where the case is referred to the enlarged Board of Appeal (‘Grand Board’) or where the annulled decision had been taken by the Grand Board.

The court hearing an action for infringement or for threatened infringement on the basis of a national design right shall reject the action if a final judgement on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of a Community design providing simultaneous protection.

The Commission sees no reason why a final decision9 on Article 81 or 82 taken by an NCA in the European Competition Network (ECN), and a final judgment by a review court upholding the NCA decision or itself finding an infringement, should not be accepted in every Member State as irrebuttable proof of the infringement in subsequent civil antitrust damages cases.

Over the last two years, the number of cases closed with a judgment has risen sharply.

The court hearing an action for infringement on the basis of a Community trade mark shall reject the action if a final judgment on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of an identical national trade mark valid for identical goods or services.

The court hearing an action for infringement on the basis of a national trade mark shall reject the action if a final judgment on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of an identical Community trade mark valid for identical goods or services.

The new limitation period of five years shall not begin until a judgment having the force of res judicata is given or there is an extrajudicial settlement between the same parties on the same action.

The new limitation period of five years shall not begin until a judgment having the force of res judicata is given or there is an extrajudicial settlement between the same parties on the same action.