Übersetzung für "Rechtskraft der entscheidung" in Englisch

The marriage is dissolved when the decision becomes final and absolute.

In this case the period shall end at the earliest one year after the judgment has acquired the authority of a final decision.

When the decision declaring the opposition inadmissible has become final the opponent concerned is no longer a party to the proceedings.

The duration of the conditions imposed shall be calculated from the date on which the decision becomes legally binding.

In the judgment, the Court, it appears to me, stressed the finality of the decision of courts adjudicating at last instance.

The right to drive motor-vehicles in Germany ceases when the decision becomes final.

It is mandatory only with respect to the case and the parties in question, i.e. the qualified entity which brought the action and the company which is the subject of the injunction.

An opponent whose opposition has been finally rejected as inadmissible is no longer a party to the subsequent proceedings once this decision becomes final.

After such decision has become final and binding, the necessary technical equipment shall be installed in the probationer`s domicile.

If the decision is in favour of the third party, the proceedings may only be resumed after a period of three months of that decision becoming final unless the third party requests the resumption of the proceedings for grant.

The suspensive effect of an appeal deprives the contested decision of all legal effect until the appeal is decided.

According to decision G 1/94 (supra), no res judicata effect of the decision of 27 January 2000 arises against that party, because it had not been party to the said proceedings and was basing its case on a new ground for opposition.

This is because the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), which contain new aspects for the interpretation of the Basic Law, are equivalent to legally relevant changes, which may lead to the final and binding effect of a Federal Constitutional Court decision being transcended.

Where a board has decided that a patent is to be maintained on the basis of a given set of claims and a description to be adapted thereto, a party intervening during subsequent appeal proceedings confined to the issue of the adaptation of the description cannot challenge the res judicata effect of the previous board of appeal decision regardless of whether a new ground for opposition is introduced.

If the prosecution of the offence is also dependent on a decision as to the nullity or dissolution of a marriage, the period shall not begin before the expiry of the day on which the entitled person acquires knowledge that the decision is final.

Likewise, the legal effect of a board of appeal decision operates between the parties, not between parts of their business.

The decision in T 301/95 emphasises the problem of the inter partes effect of a decision and the possible consequences for national revocation and opposition proceedings.

The court action must be brought no later than six months following entry into final and binding force of the decision ending the proceedings, or following another manner of disposal of the proceedings.

If the decision is in favour of the third party, the proceedings may not be resumed earlier than three months after the decision has become final, unless the third party requests the resumption.

A member who has been sentenced (this sentence being final and unappealable) to loss of civic rights or whose license to practise medicine has been withdrawn shall, once this ruling comes into force, be deemed excluded.

This, however, has purely declaratory effect and has no influence on the res judicata effect of the decision of 27 January 2000.

If an appeal against a board of appeal decision were to be deemed admissible, the new appeal would be subject to the same rules of procedure as the previous one and would therefore have suspensive effect, thus preventing the decision appealed against from having legal effects.

After the decision on the request has become final, the design status displayed is either "Design registered" or "Design registration cancelled".

Therefore a decision on the counter-claims after the decision of invalidity of the plaintiff's CTM has entered into legal force has no consequence whatsoever on the (former) trade mark owner.

The frequency of detention review has been reduced – the charged parties can reapply for review no sooner than 30 days after the previous decision takes legal force.