Übersetzung für "In sachen gegen" in Englisch

In the matter of Her Majesty versus Carole Richardson... the case is hereby dismissed.

Johnson-Sirleaf has announced "zero tolerance" for violence against women.

We saw the same thing in our joint stance on sanctions against Iran.

It makes perfect sense for the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality to remind us, as we mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women, that, in spite of the countless legal instruments and UN declarations, not to mention the numerous resolutions in this Parliament made over many decades, we are still far from a situation of zero tolerance with regard to violence against women.

Furthermore, a group of experts from the academic world and the relevant professions has been commissioned by the Council (Justice Ministers) to produce a more detailed report on how the various national legal systems deal with fraud.

The fact that the appointment or more recognized in Cases 98 and 99/63, that only officials who have submitted the promotion of an official may ad­ versely affect another official and thus an application for the vacant post have a direct and individual interest in be the subject of an appeal within the meaning of Article 91 of the Regula­ requesting the cancellation of the notice of vacancy (preparatory to a promo­ tions, does not carry with it the duty to give reasons for such a decision.

Highest decorations for them as front-line fighters were awarded to physicians and nurses on "Secret Government Mission" ["Geheime Reichssache"] if they had been deployed during the last World War in the cause of the Final Solution against illness [Endloesung gegen Krankheit].

Both these partners in crime against the peoples, poke their noses wherever local wars incited by imperialism and social-imperialism......

Since Hyundai is far from the only manufacturer to offer such a model, the W240D must now prove itself against the competition in terms of image quality.

Only six months after his death, in June 1943, the Supreme Court, the highest US court yard in things Marconi society against the United States, entitled him as the true father of the radio.

It is necessary to make an end to the proud statement that it is the consciousness of the personal value that gives a guarantee in the matters of aversion against the mechanical and urgently enforcing harvest of evil.

When after 11 September, we decided - in this Chamber and not only here – that the priority was to potentiate the intelligence system in a context coordinated and shared with the European Union and the United Nations in the fight against terrorism, we meant to give preference to the security and prevention systems over the military option.

By then the WTO (World Trade Organization) should have issued a decision in the sugar dispute raised by Brazil, Australia and Thailand with the EU.

Is it then to be wondered that venal hirelings and cowardly slanderers have the effrontery openly to "accuse" the leaders of our Party of "treason"; that the pen pirates of the bourgeois press insolently splash this "accusation"; that the so-called prosecuting authorities barefacedly published so-called evidence on "the Lenin case," and so on?

As far as the first two points go, the revisionists were able to present their arguments with no great difficulties, and probably no serious historian will dispute today that where 'crimes against peace' and 'war crimes' are concerned, no-one need lecture Germany in particular, as it has become quite obvious by now that the Allies also bear a part of the blame for triggering the war and that they themselves committed countless 'war crimes' (if that term even means anything at all, since war itself can be considered a crime).

Regarding the first two points, the Revisionists have been able to present their arguments without too much difficulty, and it is probable that no serious historian today would contend that anyone is in a position to lecture Germany concerning "crimes against peace" and "war crimes": as a matter of fact, it has become evident that the Allies bear their share of responsibility in the starting of the war, and that they themselves committed in-numerable "war crimes" (if that expression has any meaning, given that war itself may be held a crime).

In the matter of Melnick vs. Robbins, on the count of sexual harassment we find in favor of the defendant. - Thank God.

In the matter of Jacobs versus Gale, we find in favor of Sydney.

The Commission brought a similar court action also against France (C-130/01).

In the matter of Shirley Peterson vs. Harold Watkins we find in favor of the defendant.

Last year, in June 1998, the Court of Justice ruled in a case against Italy's National Council of Customs Agents that people in the professions are entrepreneurs like anyone else and are subject to Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty.

The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has been monitoring the situation in Greece since the M.S.S v Belgium and Greece judgment was delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in 2011 on the basis of progress reports that Greece is required to submit as evidence of the execution of the judgment and on the basis of evidence from NGOs and international organisations, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), that operate in Greece.

The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has been monitoring the situation in Greece since the M.S.S v Belgium and Greece judgment was delivered by the ECHR in 2011 on the basis of progress reports that Greece is required to submit as evidence of the execution of the judgment and on the basis of evidence from NGOs and international organisations, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), that operate in Greece.

The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe has been monitoring the situation in Greece since the M.S.S v Belgium and Greece judgment was delivered by the ECHR in 2011 on the basis of progress reports that Greece is required to submit as evidence of the execution of the judgment and on the basis of evidence from NGOs and international organisations, such as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), that operate in Greece.

The Commission decided in July 2005 to bring Germany before the Court of Justice in this case ().

This infringement procedure complements the separate action taken by the Commission on this case based on Portugal's failure to respect the EU Merger Regulation (see IP/99/774).

The European Court of Justice confirmed in the Cowan v Trésor public case that provision of compensation, for example, should not be limited on grounds of nationality.

Furthermore, as found by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece,19 in such a framework, the court or tribunal should be able to examine the negative decision of the determining authority in terms of fact and law.

In the matter of Bepp vs. Foote, intentional marriage interference we find in favor of the defendant.

In the matter of Lamb versus Transatlantic we find in favor of the plaintiff and order the defendant to pay damages of 1. 1 million dollars.

In the matter of Warner v. Milbury, we find in favor of the plaintiff... ... andorderthedefendanttopay damages in the amount of 75 cents.

In the matter of Daley versus Paul's Bistro on the count of negligent infliction of emotional distress we find in favor of the defendant.

In Commonwealth versus Philbrick, one count criminal fraud we find the defendant not guilty.

Thus in Cutsforth (5) and Holleran (9) injunctions were granted in situations where it was thought that a denial of interim relief would put the plaintiff out of business and in Inntrepreneur ? Bayliss (10) interim relief was refused where to grant it would put the defendant out of business.