Übersetzung für "Betrag erstatten" in Englisch

The Swedish scheme would then reimburse the Portuguese scheme.

Any unjustified payment made pursuant to Articles 3 and 4 shall be refunded.

Click on the button Process refund for the relevant transaction.

In addition, the Member State of purchase is not required to refund the amount of VAT in question to the Member State of deduction.

Any unjustified payment made by the parties pursuant to the foregoing Articles shall be refunded.

If you’re not happy with our service, we will refund the full amount without any questions.

According to their own rules, the national health insurance funds may also reimburse the full amount.

We will refund you the full amount of the registration fee if you become sponsored.

Once you have confirmed the refund, our system will autoamtically refund the customer for the amount you entered.

If the orderer can prove the damages were less, then the lesser amount is to be reimbursed.

Taking into account that a payment may arrive to the Office for which it may be impossible to establish the identity of the person making the payment and to refund to this person, it would be appropriate that this money is retained by the Office as other revenue.

The depositary should be liable, where a financial instrument held in custody has been lost, to return a financial instrument of the identical type or of the corresponding amount to the UCITS.

It is proposed to modify article 77 of the General Regulation in order to allow the Commission, upon request of the Member States concerned, to reimburse the newly declared expenditure for the period in question by an increased amount calculated by applying a 10 percentage points top-up of the applicable co-financing rates for the priority axis.

The sales contract between the Province of Burgenland and GRAWE furthermore contains a warranty clause which stipulates — among other things — that the Province of Burgenland is obliged to reimburse GRAWE such amount as the Commission might fix in a recovery decision (and all related procedural costs for the buyer).

Indeed, the State granted to the purchaser of ETVA (i.e. Piraeus Bank) a guarantee by which the State promised to refund Piraeus Bank 100 % of any amount which ETVA would have to pay under the guarantee ETVA will issue in favour of HDW/Ferrostaal.

In the case of such a loss of a financial instrument held in custody, the depositary shall return a financial instrument of identical type or the corresponding amount to the AIF or the AIFM acting on behalf of the AIF without undue delay.

Where the insured party is found to be alive after all or part of this lump sum has been paid to those entitled in the case referred to in the last bullet point of Article 2(2), all sums paid shall be reimbursed by those entitled under him/her.

It should also be established that in case of loss of an instrument held in custody, a depositary is bound to return a financial instrument of identical type or the corresponding amount, even if the loss occurred with a sub-custodian.

According to this paragraph, the UCITS depositary, in case a financial instrument held in custody is lost, shall be under the obligation to return a financial instrument of the identical type or of the corresponding amount to the UCITS.

In its final calculations, the Commission overlooked the fact that this sum had already been paid back and asked the university to reimburse the amount in dispute.

In his complaint to the Ombudsman, he stated that he had acted in good faith and that he had no means to reimburse the amount.

Moreover, it is made clear that, in case of assets that are lost, the UCITS depositary has the general obligation to return the financial instruments of the identical type or of the corresponding amount to the UCITS ‘without undue delay’.

Any sum overpaid shall be recovered if the recipient had knowledge of the irregularity of the payment or if such irregulariry was so obvious that he could not fail to have knowledge of it.

On 6 March 1989, Mr Schumacker asked the Finanzamt to calculate his tax on an equitable basis (Paragraph 163 of the Abgabenordnung — the German Tax Code), by reference to tax category III (normally applicable to married employed persons residing in Germany, giving them the right to 'splitting') and requested that the difference between the deduction from his wages each month, on the basis of tax category I, and what would be payable by him on the basis of tax category III, be refunded to him.