Übersetzung für "Beherrschender einfluss" in Englisch

A dominant influence on the part of the contracting authorities shall be presumed in any of the following cases, in which those authorities, directly or indirectly:

To strengthen the incentives for investing in the equity funding of an SME, the presumption of absence of dominant influence on the enterprise in question was introduced, in pursuance of the criteria of Article 5(3), of Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of companies [7], as last amended by Directive 2001/65/EC.

There is a presumption that no dominant influence exists if the investors listed in paragraph 23 are not involving themselves directly or indirectly in the management of the enterprise in question, without prejudice to their rights as stakeholders.

A dominant influence shall not be presumed to be exercised solely by virtue of the fact that an office holder is exercising his functions, according to the law of a Member State relating to liquidation, winding up, insolvency, cessation of payments, compositions or analogous proceedings.

In accordance with Community law, 100 % ownership by the competent public authority, in particular in the case of public-private partnerships, is not a mandatory requirement for establishing control within the meaning of this paragraph, provided that there is a dominant public influence and that control can be established on the basis of other criteria;

A dominant influence on the part of the public authorities shall be presumed when these authorities, directly or indirectly in relation to an undertaking:

It is necessary to have a definition of ‘controlling undertaking’ relating solely to this Directive, without prejudice to the definitions of ‘group’ or ‘control’ in other acts.

Where a dominant influence is exercised through a centralised coordination, those undertakings should be supervised in accordance with the same rules as those provided for groups constituted through capital ties in order to achieve an adequate level of protection for policy holders and a level playing field between groups.

Consequently, and given that the possible existence of such direct or indirect dominant influence would already have had to be verified for the purposes of deciding whether the annual accounts of the undertakings and entities concerned should be consolidated, undertakings should be considered to be affiliated where their annual accounts are consolidated.

In such cases, where Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [12] is not applicable, it will be necessary to examine whether a direct or indirect dominant influence is present taking into account ownership, financial participation or the rules governing the undertakings.

There is a presumption that no dominant influence exists if the investors listed in the second subparagraph of paragraph 2 are not involving themselves directly or indirectly in the management of the enterprise in question, without prejudice to their rights as shareholders.

In such cases, where Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council [17] is not applicable, it will be necessary to examine whether a direct or indirect dominant influence is present taking into account ownership, financial participation or the rules governing the undertakings.

The dominant influence does not require a majority shareholding and may be determined by common personnel or by agreement (345).

Control exists when the Company has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.

Also included for 2011 are the remeasurement of purchase price obligations and the remeasurement of an existing equity investment in an entity, over which a controlling influence can be exerted following the acquisition of additional shares.

The amount for the previous year included income of €7.0million arising from the remeasurement of an existing equity-accounted investment of 23.0percent held in Willenbrock Fördertechnik Holding GmbH, Bremen, Germany, over which a controlling influence can be exerted following the acquisition of further shares.

The assets held in the Genus trust were attributed, as beneficial owner, to AIXTRON, as control existed through the trust relationship with AIXTRON SE.

Südzucker is still entitled at any time to utilize a majority of voting rights in the holding company and therefore a controlling influence over subgroup AGRANA.

The existence of a controlling influence and the fact that the danger of price distortions due to a shortage of admitted stock or stock available to the market can be excluded, alone do not justify a limitation of the application for admission.

This amount includes income of €7.0million arising from the remeasurement of an existing equity-accounted investment of 23.0percent held in Willenbrock Fördertechnik Holding GmbH, Bremen, Germany, over which a controlling influence can be exerted following the acquisition of further shares (see note [5]).

Consequently, and given that the possible existence of such direct or indirect dominant influence would already have had to be verified for the purposes of deciding whether the annual accounts of the undertakings and entities concerned should be consolidated, undertakings should be considered to be affiliated where their annual accounts are consolidated, However, Union rules on consolidated accounts are not applicable in a certain number of cases, for instance because of the size of the undertakings involved or because certain conditions relating to their legal form are not met.

The union has a dominant influence on the conservative party.

This allows you to dominate your personal environment influence the dragon.

Deutsche EuroShop exercises a controlling influence over these companies together with other shareholders.

This dominant influence of the sun characterized the Roman landscape embellished so magically unique.

It was not disputed that before mid-1997 the State was in a position to control Portugal Telecom and to have a dominant influence over its operations since it held more than 50 % of the company's shares.

A dominant influence (or control) on the part of the public authorities shall be presumed when these authorities directly or indirectly:

The first category refers to any undertaking over which the public authorities may exercise, directly or indirectly, a dominant influence by virtue of their ownership of it, their financial participation therein, or the rules which govern it.

Although these councillors act as trustees ex officio, the fact that they are nominated by the SIC means that the latter is able to exercise a dominant influence over the trust and SLAP as well as over the funds at their disposal.

According to the description given above, it should be noted that SNCF, as an EPIC [industrial and commercial public undertaking], is a public undertaking within the meaning of Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC of 25 June 1980 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings [45] as the public authorities may exercise directly or (159) indirectly a dominant influence on SNCF by virtue of their ownership of it or because of their financial participation in it or the rules which govern it.

At the same time, however, Parliament's demands from the first reading would also be taken into account. These provide for limiting additional solvency requirements resulting from belonging to a group to cases in which risk-enhancing influences between undertakings may actually be possible as well, particularly where a dominant influence is being exercised.

The fact that the public authorities may exercise directly or indirectly a dominant influence does not prove that they actually exercised that influence in a given case.

The Commission notes that SEPI is a public holding company which is directly depending on the Ministry of Finance. As such it is considered as a public undertaking in the sense of Commission Directive 2000/52/EC [17] amending Commission Directive 80/723/EEC [18], since due to its ownership or its financial participation the public authorities can directly or indirectly exercise a dominant influence on SEPI.

As such it is considered as a public undertaking in the sense of Commission Directive 2000/52/EC of 26 July 2000 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings [9], since due to its ownership or its financial participation, the public authorities can directly or indirectly exercise a dominant influence on SEPI.

For sure this crisis is a welcome distraction for President Musharraf, under pressure now for dismissing his Chief Justice, attempting to justify five more years in power and keen, of course, to retain the pervasive influence of the Pakistani army.