Übersetzung für "Alles in einen topf werfen" in Englisch

On that point, it is important not to confuse everything again and lump everything together.

I do not think we can mix things up in this way.

Let us stop mixing up the issues.

There is no point in trying to put everything under one roof.

Observers who merely look on when they should be protecting the victims, people and property.

It is very fashionable at the moment in some parts of the world to talk about the posttraumatic shock of those who fought in the war in Vietnam.

That's if you really pool it all together, and that's for the entire school year.

Lumping everything together blurs the image, and confuses discussion on the subject as to whether we need to correct mistakes or call in the police.

Do not try to put everything in one basket and use renewable sources of energy like a big curtain to cover the truth, which is that a large proportion of European citizens feel anything from reservations to opposition to the use of nuclear energy and that cannot be made to disappear with a magic wand.

As regards bullfighting, we do not accept the rapporteur's position, given that it is wrong to apply a broad brush approach to everything.

I do not think therefore that we should confuse all of the issues; above all, we must not fall behind schedule, given that the Italian Presidency ends in December and that our work will be completed at the end of April.

It would not be easy to mix everything together and to try to resolve all the issues facing the European Union by 2004.

We must remain vigilant, but must not lump everything together by listing examples of individual attacks perpetrated in Member States fighting against racism and homophobia with extreme positions openly adopted by some governments.

The radioactive cloud, paradoxically, bears one or two par ticles of freedom, because in an equation of this kind, truth cannot be hidden indefinitely.

Let me welcome here those vigorous responses which testify in Germany to the soundness of German democracy and also welcome, although here I feel a rather different kind of anxiety, the action of those in Germany who are striving to ensure that the right of asylum is not curtailed, is not diminished.

In conclusion, he underlined the importance of co-existence which involved an active acceptance of the future.

Discernment allows one always to distinguish, so as not to confuse, and so as never to “paint everyone with the same brush”.

It just seems crazy to lump everyone together.

But Denise insisted we all pool our money.

It would be absurd to put Alewis, Sunnis, and Kurds all in the same pot.

The second point I wish to raise is that we must be careful not to lump all non-signatories together, since this group also includes some countries, such as Finland, who operate a very strict monitoring procedure to ensure that no mines are exported from their territory to other parts of the world.

If we mix all this up into one single cocktail, we will get carried away for good, sympathetic, political reasons, but we would actually endanger the access of international humanitarian organisations into this troubled arena.

I would like to end by associating myself with those who are calling for a detailed inquiry at this juncture into where, within the non-governmental organisations, responsibility for what happened lies - clearly, as always, we must avoid putting everything under the same umbrella - for there is no doubt that responsibility does lie somewhere and it must be ascertained where, not least in view of the generosity displayed by the European Union and the European Commission towards non-governmental organisations.

Then we also find ourselves in close proximity to a region that has been showing signs in recent years of religious fanaticism. I do not include everyone, of course.

Worse is the swiftness with which they are systematically dismantling the hard won gains of stakeholders WITHOUT CONSULTATION and the total lack of understanding that would engender them to believe that all Creative Industries can be lumped together.

Of course, there are many different kinds of democratic transitions, and lumping them all together might be misleading.

Parliament, in its perennial quest to go one step further and faster than the Commission and the Council, has wheeled out its regulating steamroller and wants to put all the networks in one basket.

The second point I wish to raise is that we must be careful not to lump all non-signatories together, since this group also includes some countries, such as Finland, who operate a very strict monitoring procedure to ensure that no mines are exported from their territory to other parts of the world.