Translation of "Unterschiedliche sachverhalte" in English

For other aid granted in the agricultural sector, situations may differ widely.

This Article deals with two separate issues.

These are two very different things which one has to discuss.

They are two different situations.

In the context of the Structural Funds the word partnership can refers to two different arrangements:

I think that there is a basic error in this reasoning: the issue of defending borders and the issue of asylum are two wholly separate matters.

The Committee notes that the conformity assessment procedures cover a very wide range of devices and highly different circumstances and conditions.

The Committee would like to draw the Commission's attention to the words "general interest", which in reality may mean different things in different Member States, and to the need to exercise care when translating the different language versions.

The principle of non-discrimination prohibits, first, treating similar situations differently and, secondly, treating different situations in the same way unless there are objective reasons for such treatment.

The principle of non-discrimination means that comparable situations should not be treated differently and that different situations should not be treated in the same way, unless there are objective grounds for doing so.

The Commission also recalled that, under European Union law, the concepts of ‘equal treatment’ and ‘non-discrimination’ prohibit treating similar situations differently, or different situations in the same way, without any objective ground for doing so [7].

Generally, the use of the same expression for very different concepts generates confusion in the interpretation of the Convention.

In the absence of Community-level harmonisation of the tax provisions of the Member States, such an approach would in effect compare different factual and legal situations arising from legislative and regulatory disparities between the Member States.

The Advocate General states that the refusal amounts to discrimination on grounds of nationality, prohibited by Community law, as it treats objectively different situations in the same way.

In fact, according to the Court, those different possibilities reflect situations which are clearly different and cannot therefore be treated in the same way by the tax system.

She concludes that, although both decisions have as their subject matter infringements by the same international cartel, they are otherwise based on different facts.

The discrepancy between the list of exclusions from the scope of application of this proposal and the parallel provision of Regulation No 44/2001 is explained by the fact that they are governing different matters that call for a substantially different approach and a different perspective.

In its annual reporting on the state of the resources, the Commission highlights two different situations:

If, as the plaintiff in the main proceedings maintains, the national court seeks also to ascertain, by its second question, whether the producers of Burley I tobacco have received less favourable treatment than the producers of other varieties of tobacco, it must be pointed out that, by virtue of the general principle of equal treatment in Community law, of which the prohibition of discrimination laid down in Article 40(3) of the EC Treaty is a specific expression, comparable situations must not be treated differently and different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified.

According to well-established case-law, discrimination can result from treating differently situations which are comparable or treating different situations in the same way.

Although those situations highlight shortcomings that are completely different in nature, they both create obstacles which impede the proper functioning of the internal market.

The Court recalls that the general principle of equal treatment, as a general principle of Community law, requires that comparable situations must not be treated differently and different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified.

The Court notes that the principle of non-discrimination precludes different treatment of comparable situations and like treatment of different situations.

Moreover, it would have to be decided whether the connecting factor chosen should be the same for several civil status situations or whether different factors would be more appropriate depending on each situation.

The Court states that the principle of equal treatment requires that comparable situations must not be treated differently and that different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified.

According to the principle of non-discrimination, comparable situations must not be treated differently and different situations must not be treated in the same way unless such treatment is objectively justified.