Translation of "Fehlende zuständigkeit" in English

They invoked the Commission’s absence of power, breach of the duty to state reasons and breach of the principle of equal treatment.

They were held therefore to have power of ordination, but to lack jurisdiction, save subordinately.

I am quite happy to accept Mr Gawronski’s amendment in this connection, since it shows up the ludicrous nature of the gap in competence.

This has had a series of negative effects, such as a lack of efficiency and transparency, the exclusion of the European Parliament from the legislative process; in addition, the European Court of Justice does not have overall jurisdiction.

Member States should make up for the lack of constitutional competence by showing political determination and put into operation common European policies through better and more efficient cooperation to realise the SEAK.

Member States should make up for the lack of constitutional competence by showing political determination and put into operation common European policies through better and more efficient cooperation in order to realise the CEAK.

Member States should make up for the lack of constitutional competence by showing political determination and put into operation common European policies through better and more efficient cooperation in order to realise the Common European Area of Knowledge.

The legal shortcomings became clear, and Commissioner Wulf-Mathies pointed out in plenary that the Communitys powers in this area were not adequate.

In support of their case, the applicants invoked a lack of competence on the Commission’s part, a breach of the duty to state reasons and breach of the principle of equal treatment.

The plaintiff had also relied on Article 18 of the Convention, on the ground that the de­fendant had not restricted itself to arguing that the Rechtbank had no jurisdiction but had also presented argument on the substance of the case.

Nor could the plaintiff argue that the defendant had submitted to the jurisdiction by entering an appearance (Article 18), since at first instance the defendant had not ap­peared at all and at second instance had appeared solely in order to contest the juris­diction of the French courts.

Nor could the plaintiff argue that the defendant had submitted to the jurisdiction by en­tering an appearance (Article 18), since at first instance the defendant had not appeared at all and at second instance had appeared solely in order to contest the jurisdiction of the French courts.

The defendants argued that the Rechtbank had no jurisdiction, on the ground that the effect of the Convention's general jurisdiction rule, under which a person domiciled in a Contracting State must be sued in the courts ofthat State, was that the exception made for actions on guarantees (in the Dutch text "vrijwaring") in Article 6 (2) was not appli­cable in this case.

The German undertaking Wiest, which had been sued in an Italian court for its failure to supply goods under a contract of sale, objected to the jurisdiction of the court and requested a decision on jurisdiction from the Corte di cassazione under Article 41 of the Codice di procedura civile.

An answer cannot be refused on the grounds of the principle of departmental responsibility – here, the lack of authority of the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Technology – because the Members of Parliament have a right to ask questions of the Federal Government as a whole.

The Parliamentary State Secretary of the Minister for Economic Affairs and Technology finally refused to answer this question by invoking the lack of competence of the Federal Minister for Economic Affairs; by this, the respondent curtailed the right to ask questions of applicant 1. in a constitutionally impermissible manner.

Because competence in this sphere is lacking, the Commission is cautious about putting forward solutions.

The Landgericht dismissed the claim on the ground that the German courts had no jurisdiction.

The lack of correction of this condition can lead to congestive chronic prostatitis.

Since the Greek Government has adduced no such evidence, its plea that the Commission had no such power must be rejected.

The Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt am Main dismissed the contention that the German courts lacked international jurisdiction.

The proceedings brought in Germany were therefore inadmissi­ble, since the German courts had no jurisdiction.

The idea of special European diploma programmes would however seem at first sight to be at odds with the European Union's lack of powers over educational curricula.

In support of its appeal, the Commission raises pleas in law relating, first, to the reasoning of the Court of First Instance on the Commission's lack of competence to adopt the decisions at issue and, second, to the interpretation adopted by the Court of First Instance of the conditions for withdrawal of the marketing authorisations, such as those conditions are defined by the first paragraph of Article 11 of Directive 65/65.

Those are the two assumptions which I shall touch on briefly even though, as I am going to demonstrate, it is not necessary to examine their relevance for the purpose of assessing the merits of the pleas of lack of competence and infringement of the Treaty.

Consequently, the pleas of lack of competence and infringement of the Treaty raised by the Parliament should be upheld and the contested provisions should be annulled.

The German undertaking entered an appearance and objected to the jurisdiction of the court, relying on a clause in the contract, concluded in August 1969, which provided that a German court should have jurisdiction in any disputes.