Translation of "Klage auf zahlung" in English

It also submitted that the claim for the payment of royalties ihould be dismissed.

Subsequently, the plaintiff commenced proceedings in England to recover monies under the reinsurance policies.

The Cour d'Appel quashed the judgment of the lower court.

The employee raised complaint on payment of the amount.

It is clear, both from its title and from the principles that it lays down, that Recommendation 81/924 applies only to the structure of the electricity tariff.

The claim was for damages of approximately £100,000.

The seven passengers in question brought a legal action for €250 each in respect of the cancellation of the flight.

On 23 January 1996 Tacconi brought an action against HWS in the Tribunale di Perugia (District Court, Perugia) for a declaration that a contract between HWS and a leasing company B.N. Commercio e Finanza SpA ('BN') for the sale of a moulding plant in respect of which BN and Tacconi had already, with the agreement of HWS, concluded a leasing contract, had not been concluded because of HWS's unjustified refusal to carry out the sale, and hence its breach of its duty to att honestly and in good faith.

In some cases, this task will be entrusted to the public prosecutor's office, which has far wider responsibility for defending the interests of the community as a whole.

Alleging that the defendant had unilaterally and improperly terminated their commer­cial relationship, the plaintiff brought proceedings before the Tribunal de Commerce, Paris, for the payment of commission and damages.

In December 1974 Mr Kantner brought proceedings before a German court for the payment of his fee, the amount of which was not in dispute.

He brought proceedings against his principal be­fore the Tribunal d'Arrondissement, Luxembourg, for the payment of commission and expenses.

As a result, the dismissal of the action on grounds of want of jurisdiction became final and conclusive in so far as the action sought the payment of outstanding incidental charges and compensation for damage caused by the defendant.

The plaintiff sued for the re­covery of the rent on the ground that the rented accommodation consisted merely of furnished rooms without sanitary facilities. The action was based on delict, namely on the claim that the defendant had deceived the plaintiff as to the facilities provided in the rented property.

The plaintiff resigned as a result of disagree­ments with the subsidiary company and brought proceedings before the Tribunal du travail, Brussels, in his capacity as an employee, against the subsidiary company and, following the bankruptcy of that undertaking, against Durament, for payment of ar­rears of salary.

The defendant gave notice to termi­nate the contract and brought proceedings in Modena for a declaration that the con­tract was rescinded, whereupon the plaintiff sued for damages in the Landgericht Stutt­gart.

Heidemann GmbH, which had its registered office in Bocholt (Germany), brought pro­ceedings for payment of goods supplied against Jongen before the Netherlands court for the place where Jongen had its registered office.

The national court asked whether Article 5(1) of the Convention was to be understood as meaning that, in the case of a claim for payment by a supplier against his customer under a contract for manufacture and supply, the place of performance of the obligation to pay must be determined pursuant to the substantive law applicable to the obligation in issue under the conflicts rules of the court seised, even if those rules refer to the application to the contract of provisions such as those of the Uniform Law on the International Sale of Goods, annexed to the Hague Convention of 1 July 1964.

Lothar Luz, an Italian national, brought an action before the Tribunale di Varese against two German nationals resident in Munich for payment of money due on sales made between 1968 and 1977 of various plots of land in Italy to the defendants and the construction of a house on their instructions.

Article 49(l)(a) of Regulation No 1408/71 establishes the principle whereby each of the competent institutions administering a legislation whose conditions are satisfied is to calculate the amount of the benefit due, in accordance with Article 46.

The Corte d'Appello found that the Italian action for a reduction in the purchase price had been commenced before the action for payment of the purchase price had been brought by the defendant in the Belgian court.

Since the claim was for payment of the purchase price it concerned rights in movable property and therefore the defen­dant had properly been sued in the court at his place of residence.

Following the breach of that contract of employment on 8 December 1971 the worker brought an action on 27 November 1973 in the Tribunal d'Instance, Molsheim, claiming payment of certain sums from his former employer.

After the defendant had refused to accept goods which were alleged to have been de­livered too late the plaintiff brought an action in the court for the place where it has its seat in the Federal Republic of Germany for payment of the purchase price and an order that the goods should be accepted.

Following the breach of that contract of employment on 8 December 1971 the worker brought an action on 27 November 1973 in a French court claiming pay­ment of certain sums from his former employer.