Übersetzung für "Drohende verletzung" in Englisch

Each Party shall ensure that, even before the commencement of proceedings on the merits of the case, the competent judicial authorities may, upon request by a party who has presented reasonably available evidence to support his or her claims that his intellectual property right has been infringed or is about to be infringed, order prompt and effective provisional measures to preserve relevant evidence in respect of the alleged infringement, subject to the protection of confidential information.

Each Party shall ensure that the judicial authorities may, at the request of the applicant, issue against the alleged infringer an interlocutory injunction intended to prevent any imminent infringement of an intellectual property right.

Where the measures to preserve evidence are revoked, or where they lapse due to any act or omission by the applicant, or where it is subsequently found that there has been no infringement or threat of infringement of an intellectual property right, the judicial authorities shall have the authority to order the applicant, upon request of the defendant, to provide the defendant appropriate compensation for any injury caused by those measures.

Where the provisional measures are revoked or where they lapse due to any act or omission by the applicant, or where it is subsequently found that there has been no infringement or threat of infringement of an intellectual property right, the judicial authorities shall have the authority to order the applicant, upon request of the defendant, to provide the defendant appropriate compensation for any injury caused by those measures.

Member States shall lay down that the judicial authorities may serve the alleged infringer, or the intermediary whose services are being used by a third party to infringe a right, with an interlocutory injunction intended to prevent any impending infringement of an intellectual property right, or to forbid, on a provisional basis and subject to a recurrent fine, the continuation of the alleged infringements of an intellectual property right, or to make such continuation subject to the lodging of guarantees intended to ensure the compensation of the right holder.

The EC Party and the Signatory CARIFORUM States shall ensure that the judicial authorities may, at the request of the applicant issue an interlocutory injunction intended to prevent any imminent infringement of an intellectual property right, or to forbid, on a provisional basis and subject, where appropriate, to a recurring penalty payment where provided for by national law, the continuation of the alleged infringements of that right, or to make such continuation subject to the lodging of guarantees intended to ensure the compensation of the right holder where an infringement is determined.

The ingenious construction of a European citizenship which is not based on the prior and essential requirement of being a citizen of a Member State, of a European citizenship which is above the constitutions of the States of the Union, with no legal basis nor solid political foundation, rashly granted to passport holders from non-EU countries, even if they are residents, would be a source of confusion and would endanger the rights of the nationals of the fifteen Member States.

A perpetual injunction isgranted only after the plaintiff has finally established his right and the actual or threatened infringement of it by the defendant.

This results in the urgent need for continuous, intraoperative monitoring of the NLR, in order to recognize the threat of injury to the nerve during mobilization of the thyroid, in timely manner.

In particular, it is signaled to the operator that his/her arms are near the security zone 7, so that the operator can avoid the danger of injury by removing his/her hands from the warning zone 8 . This does not require an intervention into the security zone 7, which would result in an undesirable shutdown of the assembly robot 1 .

You agree that breach of the above confidentiality obligations will cause irreparable harm to PWE, and PWE is entitled to (in addition to any other remedies available to it) ex parte injunctive relief without bond to prevent the breach or threatened breach of your obligations.

You agree that EasyDresses.net's remedy at law for any actual or threatened breach of this Agreement would be inadequate and that EasyDresses.net shall be entitled to specific performance or injunctive relief, or both, in addition to any damages that EasyDresses.net may be legally entitled to recover, together with reasonable expenses of any form of dispute resolution, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees.

You shall immediately notify EasyDresses.net of any unauthorized use of your password or identification or any other breach or threatened breach of this Site's security.

You agree that financial compensation alone may not be adequate for us if there is a breach or threatened breach of our Terms and that we are entitled to seek all remedies available to us.

The Community patent may not be the subject of actions in respect of threatened infringement.

Paragraph 2 stipulates that the Community patent cannot be the subject of an action in respect of threatened infringement.

Where there is a demonstrable risk that evidence may be destroyed even before the commencement of proceedings on the merits of the case, the Community Patent Court may, in the event of an actual or imminent infringement of a Community patent, authorise in any place either the detailed description, with or without the taking of samples, or the physical seizure of the infringing goods, and, in appropriate cases, the documents relating thereto.

The Community design court hearing an action for infringement or threatened infringement on the basis of a Community design shall reject the action if a final judgement on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of a design right providing simultaneous protection.

The court hearing an action for infringement or for threatened infringement on the basis of a national design right shall reject the action if a final judgement on the merits has been given on the same cause of action and between the same parties on the basis of a Community design providing simultaneous protection.

Member States shall lay down that, where there is a demonstrable risk that evidence may be destroyed even before the commencement of proceedings on the merits of the case, the judicial authorities may, in the event of an actual or imminent infringement of an intellectual property right, authorise in any place either the detailed description, with or without the taking of samples, or the physical seizure of the infringing goods, and, in appropriate cases, the documents relating thereto.

In order to ensure that protection, the regulation provides that Member States are to designate in their territories ‘Community trade mark courts’ having jurisdiction for infringement actions and, if they are permitted under national law, actions in respect of threatened infringement relating to Community trade marks.

Where in an action for infringement or for threatened infringement a Community design court finds that the defendant has infringed or threatened to infringe a Community design, it shall, unless there are special reasons for not doing so, order the following measures:

Where actions for infringement or for threatened infringement involving the same cause of action and between the same parties are brought before the courts of different Member States, one seized on the basis of a Community design and the other seized on the basis of a national design right providing simultaneous protection, the court other than the court first seized shall of its own motion decline jurisdiction in favour of that court.

An injunction can be obtained by bringing an action either after the infringement has taken place or as soon as it is threatened.

Once the professional interests of another vendor are endangered, Article 98 of the Act (previously Article 57) allows any interested party, i.e. any economic operator playing an active part in competition, to bring cease-and-desist proceedings against the disputed act or acts.

Purchaser shall indemnify SBC AG for all costs and damages, including attorneys’ fees, suffered by SBC AG as a result of purchaser’s culpable actual or threatened breach of these terms and conditions.

You agree that beads.us's remedy at law for any actual or threatened breach of this Agreement would be inadequate and that beads.us shall be entitled to specific performance or injunctive relief, or both, in addition to any damages that beads.us may be legally entitled to recover, together with reasonable expenses of any form of dispute resolution, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees.

According to the Federal Supreme Court, the international jurisdiction of the German courts for the injunctive relief for threatened infringement of the "Covet" trademark is given because, according to the Federal Supreme Court, Germany is the place of realization of the damage success in the sense of Art. 5 No. 3 Brussels I-VO .