Übersetzung für "Patent opposition" in Deutsch

He specialises in patent applications, opposition and invalidation proceedings.

Her main areas of practice include patent prosecution, opposition and appeal proceedings as well as infringement and nullity complaints.

In addition, she advises and represents clients in patent grant and opposition proceedings.

This allows the new proprietor to defend his patent in opposition proceedings before the EPO.

One of our main activities is the representation in patent examination and opposition proceedings at the German and the European Patent Office.

Sophie drafts patent applications and represents clients in patent prosecution, opposition and appeal proceedings.

Under the EPC it is possible to withdraw a patent application, opposition or appeal.

His main areas of practice as a trainee patent attorney and patent engineer include patent prosecution, opposition and appeal proceedings as well as infringement and nullity complaints.

In Denmark, France (see Paris court of appeal judgment of 14 April 2010), Iceland, Latvia, Luxembourg, Monaco, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland/Liechtenstein and the United Kingdom, the new rules also apply to European patents granted before 1 May 2008 and amended on or after that date (mention published in the European Patent Bulletin) in opposition, appeal or limitation proceedings.

His work includes advising on patent prosecution, opposition, nullity, and infringement proceedings as well as the preparation of opinions on infringement and validity.

This legal remedy is available to the patent proprietor in opposition proceedings "if the non-observance in question has the direct consequence, by virtue of this Convention, of causing the revocation of the European patent" (Article 122(1) EPC).

After the grant of the patent, opposition proceedings provide an opportunity for a re-examination as to whether or not the necessary requirements for the grant or maintenance of the patent are met.

If during the opposition proceedings it becomes apparent that the previous application from which the opposed patent claims priority is not in an official language of the European Patent Office and the validity of the priority claim is relevant to the determination of the patentability of the subject-matter of the patent concerned, the opposition division will invite the patent proprietor to file a translation of that application into one of the official languages within a period to be specified.

The main focus of his work is on patent prosecution and opposition proceedings before the European Patent Office and on the preparation of freedom-to-operate and validity opinions.

Both Articles could in fact also be taken to refer to the preceding Article 78 EPC and would thus apply only to the European patent application prior to grant of the patent and not to the European patent in opposition proceedings.

As pointed out in G1/10, it was always open to a patent proprietor to seek to amend his patent during opposition or limitation proceedings and such amendment could remove a perceived error.

In the annual firm ranking conducted by the well-known specialist journal Managing Intellectual Property (MIP) Maiwald is particularly recommended for its expertise in patent prosecution, especially opposition and appeal proceedings.

In the Board's view, amendments to the text of a granted patent during opposition proceedings should only be considered as "appropriate" and "necessary" in the sense of Rules 57(1) and 58(2) EPC and therefore admissible, if they can fairly be said to arise out of the grounds of opposition laid down in Article 100 EPC.

If the proprietors of the patent are not the same for different designated Contracting States, the unity of the European patent in opposition proceedings will not be affected, since such persons are to be regarded as joint proprietors (seeD?I, 6, second and third paragraphs).

The question of the admissibility of an opposition filed by someone acting as a straw man concerns the right to act or be represented as a party before the European Patent Office in opposition proceedings and appeal proceedings following opposition.

The Court held that no provision precluded requesting that INPI limit the French part of the European patent while opposition proceedings were pending before the EPO.

As to the position after grant, within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent (Article 99 EPC).

It follows from these provisions - which, in the view of the board, are applicable by analogy to situations where a legal person ceases to exist due to a merger - that the legislator has contemplated the procedural consequences of universal succession in law for the applicant or proprietor during patent grant or opposition proceedings.

The overall purpose of the admissibility requirement is to allow the proprietor of the patent and the opposition division to examine the alleged ground for revocation without recourse to independent enquiries.

Revocation of a European patent during opposition proceedings where the patent proprietor states that he no longer approves the text in which the patent was granted and does not submit an amended text or where the proprietor requests that the patent be revoked.