Übersetzung für "Furnishing proof" in Deutsch

While studies must be conducted to find out about the dangers of endocrine disrupters, firms using suspect products must also be made subject to regulations applicable to drugs, especially in terms of furnishing proof that these products are harmless, whenever they are considered suspect by the European groups of experts.

Member States may exempt exporters from furnishing proof other than the transport document required under Article 16, where an export operation offers adequate guarantees of arrival at destination of products covered by an export declaration granting entitlement to a refund the variable component of which does not exceed:

Some proportional allowance should be made for distillers who, although they have met their principal obligations, are late in furnishing proof thereof.

Member States may exempt exporters from furnishing proof required under Article 16 other than the transport document, in case of an export declaration giving entitlement to a refund the differentiated part of which is less than or equal to:

In the light of these special circumstances and with a view to simplifying the administrative work involved in granting export refunds under this Regulation, it is appropriate to give Member States greater flexibility in applying Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 612/2009 in so far as it relates to the thresholds below which Member States may exempt operators from furnishing the proof required other than the transport document.

In case of export declarations concerning a maximum quantity of 25 tonnes of sugar, and when the conditions referred to in Article 24(2)(a) and (b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 612/2009 are met, Member States shall exempt exporters from furnishing the proof provided in paragraph 1 and 2(b) and (c) of this Article.

In the light of these special circumstances and with a view to simplifying the administrative work involved in granting export refunds under Regulation (EC) No 1043/2005, it is appropriate to adopt special provisions giving Member States greater flexibility than those set out in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 in so far as they relate to the maximums below which the Member States may exempt operators from furnishing the proof required under Article 16 of the latter Regulation.

It is therefore appropriate, where goods are packaged for consumer retail sale or where goods follow well established regular export patterns involving exports by the same exporter of goods of the same CN code to the same consignee, to confer on Member States the flexibility, at their discretion, to exempt exporters from furnishing the proof required under Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999, provided that they require exporters to submit such proof on a spot check basis.

Member States may exempt exporters from furnishing the proof required pursuant to Article 16 other than the transport document or its electronic equivalent as referred to in Article 16(3), in case of an export declaration giving entitlement to a refund where:

Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 800/1999 provides that Member States may, in certain circumstances, exempt exporters from furnishing the proof, other than the transport document, required under Article 16 of that Regulation.

Member States may exempt exporters from furnishing the proof required pursuant to Article 17 other than the transport document or its electronic equivalent as referred to in Article 17(3), in case of an export declaration giving entitlement to a refund where:

The report also emphasises that the food business operator is responsible for furnishing the proof that either there are no hazards that must be prevented, eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels, or that identified hazards are sufficiently and regularly controlled through the implementation of general and specific food hygiene requirements.

The failure by the Portuguese Republic to repeal Decree-Law No 48 051, which makes the award of damages to individuals subject to the furnishing of proof of fault or fraud on the part of the Portuguese State or public entities concerned, must be regarded as serious since, although it does not render it impossible for individuals to bring judicial actions, it would appear, none the less, as also pointed out by the Advocate General in paragraph 51 of his Opinion, to render those actions more difficult and costly, so impairing the full effectiveness of the Community’s public procurement policy.

Since the purpose of Article 3 is to ensure that the person or persons who manage continuously and effectively the transport operations of the undertaking satisfy the condition as to professional capacity, the wording of Article 5(1), "[n]atural persons and undertakings furnishing proof that, before 1 January 1978, they were authorized under national regulations in a Member State to engage in the occupation of road haulage operator", must be interpreted as meaning that it refers to persons who, before that date, have been authorized, in accordance with a national regulation, to manage effectively and continuously the transport operations of an undertaking.