Übersetzung für "Staatlichen eingriff" in Englisch

Some people will stand against a government intervention.

Whenever the financial situation of the undertaking is improved as a result of State intervention, an advantage is present.

For the neoliberal, the “free market” undisturbed by any state intervention is the ideal.

It is astonishing that our economy is still flourishing in spite of the ongoing increase in the predilection for government intervention.

His fellow Member of Parliament José Bové likewise stressed that the dairy market could not function without state intervention.

Our Ukrainian friends have expressed concern over the organisation of the coming elections, over the excessive representation of the ruling coalition in the Central Electoral Commission, the restrictions on non-governmental organisations and state interference in the activities of opposition parties.

I believe that with the government's intervention, thousands of jobs were saved, obviously through an increase in expenditure in the social sector.

In the context of the European Commission guidelines describing the conditions for state intervention, we believe that it is entirely possible to include support for single wagon load transport, whether in the form of compensation for public-service obligations or in the form of aid for ...

In line with the findings of the Court of Justice in Preussen Elektra [13], the Authority considers the obligation to set aside certain revenues for charity purposes to be a state intervention stemming from the Norwegian Regulation on instructions for the reserves of Norsk Tipping AS No 797 of 8 June 1998, but without leading to foregone revenues by the State [14].

The Norwegian authorities have set maximum limits for increases in core capital ratios through capital injections from the Fund which are linked to the level of core capital existing in a bank prior to any state intervention.

However, in its assessment of the necessity of the aid, the Commission examines whether the objective in the common interest could be achieved without State intervention or whether a market failure prevents this.

The provision on paying dividends by Correos is reflected in the State General Budget both under the Capital item of the Company and the non-tax State income Chapter.

This restriction stems from significant State interference, i.e. a business licence which limits the company's scope of activity to the export market.

Namely, all three companies could not demonstrate that their business decisions were taken in response to market signals, without significant State interference.

This is however insufficient to restore the situation that would have prevailed without aid since during several years HSY has benefited from a loan which it would not have received without State intervention.

The Commission observed that the new tariff seemed different from the Alumix tariff, as the Alumix tariff was granted directly by ENEL, the Italian monopolist electricity operator, while the new tariff involved the selective intervention of the State to compensate the difference between the market price agreed by the beneficiaries with their power suppliers and the preferential price fixed in 1996.

Namely, the company could not demonstrate that its business decisions were taken in response to market signals, without significant State interference, in particular as sales quantities in the domestic and export markets are restricted by the Articles of Association of the company which cannot be changed without State approval.

As for the specific case of Alcoa, the Commission pointed out that the new tariff appeared to differ from the Alumix tariff in that the Alumix tariff had been granted by ENEL, Italy’s electricity supply monopoly, whereas the new tariff involved the selective intervention of the State to compensate for the difference between a market price agreed with an electricity producer and the preferential price fixed in 1996.

In this respect the foreseen divestment of ING Direct US as submitted in the restructuring plan set aside a main source of difficulties that led to State intervention.

In the present case, the Commission recognises that in the absence of any State intervention to relieve Deutsche Post of part of the pension liability for its civil servants, Deutsche Post would not be able to compete on its merits with its competitors.

However, that exporting producer was not able to demonstrate that its business decisions was taken in response to market signals, without significant State interference, as explained in recital 56 of the provisional Regulation.

Moreover, it should be noted that in a communication of 9 March 2006 [49] concerning the fishing industry, the Commission considered that it would not accept aid for the purpose of public intervention to compensate for a sudden increase in fuel costs in order to avoid any distortion of competition.

According to the Commission, the notification rule constitutes disproportionate state intervention that is at odds with both an open and liberalised insurance market and the EU's non-life insurance Directives.

Without any Government intervention, there is a genuine risk, in the Commission's opinion, that the remaining sub-postmasters do not invest in what is necessary to absorb the extra flow of business, essentially of a public nature, resulting from the counter closures, thus causing a discontinuity in the delivery of a quality public service.

The Commission therefore concluded that the project will promote the use of electricity generated from renewable sources, while limiting the distortions of competition triggered by the public funding.

According to the Commission, this measure implies disproportionate state intervention that would not be in line with the open and liberalised insurance market and the EU's non-life insurance Directives.

First, the Commission found that TVO had sufficient access to financial markets to finance the whole project without any state intervention.