Übersetzung für "Nicht zur debatte stehen" in Englisch

This type of report should not pass through this Parliament.

I am getting ahead of myself.

I negotiate things that shouldn't be up for debate.

There is no question about that all.

And this shouldn't be debatable.

Conversely, that also means that many rules are not up for debate, however.

I had to lie and tell them that kids weren't even on the menu for right now.

It cannot be a question of just doing the minimum to survive.

I do not think it should be up for debate whether one remembers this.

There can be no question of upgrading Europe's relations with Israel so long as it fails to engage in constructive dialogue with all the representatives of the Palestinian people.

Therefore, I would say - and as far as I understand, all the speakers in this Parliament are in agreement for once - that there can be no question of granting discharge to the Council until we know where the money has gone.

But the ECB has made it clear not only that interest rate cuts are not on the table—it is merely postponing, not abandoning, the interest rate increase originally planned for September.

Mr Eulen first of all pointed out that he agreed with the Council, Commission and the European Parliament that there could be no question of holding a fourth pan-European transport conference forthwith.

As Mr Jipa’s rights as a worker are not in question before the referring court, the abovementioned transitional arrangements concerning Regulation No 1612/68 are not relevant in the context of the present case.

One example is economic and monetary union: here the path has been mapped out and there should be no renewed discussion on the provisions agreed.

It is a problem to which the Commission and the Council should show the utmost sensitivity as they have each, I believe, acted certainly against the spirit, if not the letter, of the interinstitutional agreement, in relation to both compulsory and noncompulsory expenditure.

Given that reference is made to the legal situation in their respective countries, I believe that the Legal Affairs Committee was quite right to take as an element in its judgement — not as an absolute consideration but as one which is useful in reaching our decision — the practice followed by the respective national parliament in similar cases.

In some respects the European Monetary System has been an unsatisfactory move in this direction.

They need essentials that are not open to debate, and they need variable rules that must be adhered to, so that this democracy, which ensures all of its citizens the same rights, is maintained and protected.

First, it is an act of private justice that has no place in a democratic society, nor should its justification be open for a debate.

If, in the present context, it is not always humans that are being discussed, what is such a subject, and what are the rights of "subjects under certain conditions", or "partial subjects" such as children, sick people, cyborgs and various intruders?

Even if the fundamental choices themselves are not under discussion, the search for an answer to a specific question becomes a process in which, through listening to the other, both sides can obtain purification and enrichment.

The same dynamic is now playing out in Italy, where the two populist parties in power have had to backpedal on past Euroskeptic remarks to make clear that “Italexit” is not on the table.

Chief negotiators from both the EU and the US argue that the lowering of standards is not up for debate and stress the maintenance of the high health-, safety-, and environmental standards already in place (cf. De Gucht, 2014 and Nass and Pinzler, 2014).

In a previous interview, Mahmoud Abbas said that dismantling the Palestinian Authority was not an option on the agenda.