Übersetzung für "Mehr gewicht haben" in Englisch

A larger community will have more weight when it comes to mastering global tasks.

A larger Community will carry more weight in its efforts to master global risks.

It'll mean more coming from you.

The more weight you have to lose the longer it will take.

Can one investigator have more weight applied to their decision than another?

The From Line & Preheader Will Have to Carry Even More Weight

Wisdom should prevail over instinct and emotions.

Secondly, it seems to me that sectoral problems are no longer as great as they used to be.

We have joined forces with other aid organisations to enhance our efforts even further.

Thus, in situations where more flexible instruments or arrangements are in place between Member States, those should prevail over this Framework Decision provided that they do not lower the protection afforded to the suspected or accused person.

We agree that in certain contexts, the EU must strive to speak with a single voice in order to be stronger on the global stage and to represent the desires that are common to all its Member States, but that cannot come about at the cost of the Member States' freedom to draw up their own foreign policies.

What I find absolutely central to the issue is what is referred to in point 8 of our resolution, which is also found in the opinion of the Committee on the Environment; namely that the labelling will only be properly effective if it is uniform and easily comprehensible to the consumer. This is incompatible with a system in which the Commission has a secondary role and in which publicity concerns carry greater weight than a series of tight, objective criteria.

As regards the proposal of the PPE-DE and PSE Groups that the Governing Council should decide by a double majority system, giving more weight to the members from the big Member States, we beg to differ.

If we succeed in ensuring that, at least in this Parliament, no one can stoop to making racist remarks, then our words and our actions will carry much more weight outside Parliament.

In the case of the International Monetary Fund, we found that, although we jointly have 30% of the vote, due to special rules for negotiating, the United States, with 17%, carries more weight than we do.

Parliament does have a role to play here: please bear in mind that we have greater importance under the Treaty than we had before.

The bigger an economy, the greater its systemic importance, and the more leverage its political representatives have in international decision-making.

Therefore, a lump-sum reflects the fact that, in many cases, small institutions are less risky and allows for a wider adjustment of the contribution of larger institutions, which are generally more systemic, in proportion to their risk profile.

Therefore, with a MIP the disadvantages likely to be suffered by importers/processors/users, if any, are not considered such as to outweigh the benefits expected to accrue to the Community producers as a consequence of the anti-dumping measures which are considered the minimum necessary to remedy the serious injury suffered and prevent further serious deterioration in the situation of the Community producers.