Übersetzung für "Im falle eines rechtsstreits" in Englisch

Will a given service be reimbursable?

We're simply documenting as thoroughly as possible, in the event this turns into a legal matter.

Consumers remain quite vulnerable in the case of litigation.

In the event of a dispute, the French courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction.

In case of litigation, the Italian version will prevail.

In case of a dispute, only the courts of the Bruges district are competent.

In the case of a legal dispute, the legal costs insurance becomes beneficial.

32Red's decision will be considered final in the event of a dispute.

In the event of any legal proceedings, the Contractor shall provide legal assistance upon request.

This shall also include all and any costs and expenditure incurred in the course of litigation.

Legal assistance insurance covers the cost of a lawyer if you're involved in a legal dispute.

It also outlines the application of this law in the event of possible legal disputes.

I am not altogether ignorant of the matter in question, as I come from a country where these things, amongst others, are produced.

Anonymity can still be granted in the event of litigation.

In case of a dispute you will have to provide strong reasons, examples to back up your claim.

In the event of a dispute, the Italian language version will prevail and foreign language translations are intended for information purposes only.

This allows them to commence proceedings in the event of a dispute, rather than resorting to domestic courts.

In the event of litigation the Swiss courts will be only qualified with LEGAL FOR IN LAUSANNE.

In case of a dispute between the customer and Zeoption, this information may be used.

From the legal point of view, which is my committee's remit, it must be stressed that the rights of consumers, as parties in cross-border disputes, will only be effectively protected by a combination of the following measures: at the international level Member States must recognize their duty to apply the 1968 Brussels Convention, the 1980 Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations and the 1965 and 1970 Hague Conventions, on unification and on the taking of evidence abroad respectively.

Verbal assurances given in good faith, I fully accept, are not what will be used by judges in the event of court challenges in the future.

Article 12 - The Committee feels that the Commission - without prejudice to the provisions of the Brussels and Lugano Conventions - should consider the possibility of including a provision on the competence of the courts which, in the case of a cross-border dispute, would allow the consumer to choose between taking legal action in the national courts of the country in which he resides or in the national courts of the country in which the supplier is domiciled or has its headquarters, while any legal action against the consumer should always be undertaken through the courts of the country where the consumer is resident.

The report showed that 32% of European consumers feel well protected when in dispute with a business based in another Member State, compared to 56% when in dispute with a domestic business.

This gives rise, for example, to specific professional liability insurance schemes and makes the provision of proof and expert evidence in legal disputes a complex affair.

However, the Committee recognizes the problem of proof in case of litigation and the difficulty of drawing limits between the notion of standard term and individually negotiated term.

This is largely due to high translation and maintenance costs and the cost of having to defend a European patent separately in the courts of each Member State, in the event of litigation, with the risk of conflicting decisions.

In the event of a dispute concerning a claim for damages, the court hearing the dispute shall assess and take into consideration, in particular where the alleged infringer is a SME, a natural person or a non-profit organisation, a university or a public research organisation, whether the alleged infringer acted without knowing or without reasonable grounds for knowing, that he was infringing the European patent with unitary effect before having been provided with the translation referred to in paragraph 1.

In the event of a dispute relating to an alleged infringement of a European patent with unitary effect, the patent proprietor shall provide at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the European patent with unitary effect into an official language of either the participating Member State in which the alleged infringement took place or the Member State in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.