Translation of "Vor gericht geltend machen" in English

In any event, the victim can claim his rights before the competent court.

According to international human rights standards, every human being is entitled to assert their rights before a court.

All citizens must be able to have their rights upheld before the court; if not, the EU anti-discrimination policy is not worth the paper it was written on.

Fifthly, provision is made for the rare occasions when a Member is obliged to assert a privilege or immunity before a court.

Major discrepancies can have undesirable consequences for accident victims, making it difficult for them to assert their rights in court.

Citizens will be able to claim before the courts the rights enshrined in the Charter, and the legal scrutiny of the Court of Justice will ensure that the Charter is applied correctly.

I also strongly support the introduction of a European system of collective redress that would enable consumers in different Member States to take their complaints jointly to the courts and seek redress, while avoiding the pitfalls of the US model.

The Chinese living in California were with this decision left practically in a legal vacuum, because they had now no possibility to assert their rightful legal entitlements or claims – possibly in cases of theft or breaches of agreement – in court.

At present, there are serious obstacles in most EU Member States that discourage consumers and businesses from claiming compensation in court in private antitrust damages actions.

It should be borne in mind that the survival of an enterprise and the jobs it provides may depend on its capacity to go to court and to assert its rights.

It should be borne in mind that the survival of an enterprise and the jobs it provides may depend on its capacity to go to court and to assert its rights.

The Court states that internet users and also, indeed, the ISP must be able to assert their rights before the court.

However, in order to reinforce legal certainty and enable family members to invoke and uphold their own interests vis-à-vis the authorities and the courts, it is important to grant them this right directly.

If one of the reasons described under subparagraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) applies and the applicant concerned was, through no fault of his/her own, incapable of asserting those reasons set forth in this paragraph in the previous procedure, in particular by filing an appeal before a court, the application will be further examined in conformity with Chapter II.

However, it must be held that, unlike the provisions at issue in the case giving rise to the judgment in Francovich and Others, Clause 5(1) of the framework agreement does not contain any unconditional and sufficiently precise obligation capable of being relied upon, in the absence of transposing measures taken within the requisite period, by an individual before a national court.

Regulation No 99/63 applies the general rule that a person whose interests are perceptibly affected by a decision taken by a public authority must be given the opportunity to make his point of view known.

Victimisation As a matter of EU gender equality law, persons who have made a complaint or instigated legal proceedings aimed at enforcing compliance with the principle of equal treatment have to be protected against dismissal or adverse treatment in reaction to their action. This provision has been transposed on a satisfactory basis in most of the countries.

In response to the reasoned opinion, the French authorities forwarded to the Commission, by letter of 18 February 1998, a note in which they proposed the insertion in the 1994 Order of a clause for the mutual recognition of 'monomers, base materials, modifying agents and additives', as defined in Articles 2 and 4 of that Order.

In order to obtain an interim measure, the applicant must prove that, without such urgent measures, there is a serious risk of irreparable prejudice to the rights which he asserts before the court (Article 399 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure).