Translation of "Rechtsstreit anhängig" in English

As far as the Commission knows, this litigation is still pending.

Tying up to buoys is completely free of charge due to a legal dispute.

This choice depends upon the terms of the arbitration agreement upon which the dispute is brought.

It shall, however, be forwarded to the Appeal Board if an action concerning the member of temporary staff is brought.

Swift and efficient debt recovery when no legal dispute is involved is therefore vitally important for business entities in the European Union.

The effects of insolvency proceedings on a lawsuit pending concerning an asset or a right of which the debtor has been divested shall be governed solely by the law of the Member State in which that lawsuit is pending.

The effects of reorganisation measures or winding-up proceedings on a pending lawsuit concerning an asset or a right of which the insurance undertaking has been divested shall be governed solely by the law of the Member State in which the lawsuit is pending.

The effects of reorganisation measures or winding-up proceedings on a pending lawsuit concerning an asset or a right of which the credit institution has been divested shall be governed solely by the law of the Member State in which the lawsuit is pending.

In this connection, it should be observed that it has been consistently held that a national court may refer a question to the Court only if there is a case pending before it and if it is called upon to give judgment in proceedings intended to lead to a decision of a judicial nature.

In those circumstances, the Raad van State, before which the dispute was brought, referred questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.

The effects of a reorganisation measure or the winding-up proceedings on a lawsuit pending against the insurance undertaking shall be governed by the law of the Member State in which the lawsuit is pending.

In that context, the cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium), which is hearing the case on appeal, is asking the Court of Justice to clarify the concept of an eligible ‘licensee’ during the first phase of the sunrise period.

The court hearing the case, the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Lombardia (Lombardy Regional Administrative Court), asked the Court of Justice of the European Communities whether Community law precludes the direct award by a municipality of a concession for the management of the public gas-distribution service to a company with predominantly public share capital in which that municipality holds a 0.97% share.

The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), London, before which the dispute has been brought, is asking the Court whether, despite her imprisonment, Ms G. may benefit from that enhanced protection against expulsion.

Furthermore, since the purpose of the action in the main proceedings is to annul the refusal of a court clerk to effect service of the documents requested, which allegedly adversely affect the rights of the applicant, the Court finds that the referring court is called on to adjudicate on a dispute and therefore exercises judicial functions.

The Raad van State (Council of State), which had to decide the case, referred a number of questions to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling.

On the first point, it is clear both from the wording and the scheme of Article 177 of the Treaty and Article 20 of the Statute of the Court of Justice that a national court or tribunal is not empowered to bring a matter before the Court of Justice by way of a reference for a preliminary ruling unless a case is pending before it. Where a case is referred for a preliminary ruling, only the request for interpretation or a decision on validity is addressed to the Court; the case itself is not transferred.

However, it was not possible to deduce from that right that the court hearing a dispute was the only body empowered to grant access to the documents in the proceedings in question.

Where the Court of Justice is seised of a case in which the same issue of interpretation is raised, or where the Court First Instance is seised of a case in which the validity of the same Community patent is called in question, the Community Patent Court may, after hearing the parties, stay proceedings before it until such time as the Court of Justice or the Court of First Instance shall have delivered judgment.