Übersetzung für "In anbetracht des vorstehenden" in Englisch

In the light of the foregoing, the claim was rejected.

In light of the above, the argument regarding the possible effect of exchange rate movements must be rejected.

Considering the above we supported the amendments to the González Triviño.

Given the above, the reported HRB prices were not considered reliable.

In view of the above, the continued imposition of measures does not appear to be against the Community interest.

Considering the above, the initiation of this interim review was entirely of an ancillary nature.

Considering the above we supported the amendments to the González Triviño.

In view of the above, Commission Decision 2000/137/EC, as amended by Commission Decision 2002/669/EC, should be repealed.

Considering the above, and in the absence of any alternatives, Brazil was selected as the most appropriate analogue country.

In the light of the foregoing, the duty established in this review should not be higher than the injury margin.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission fully supports the Council's position.

In view of the foregoing, it is obvious that the objects of the invention have been solved.

In view of all the above, the offers of undertakings submitted by OJSC ‘Azot’, CJSC MCC Eurochem in respect of goods produced at its production facilities of JSC Nak Azot, Russia, and Joint Stock Company ‘Acron’ together with Joint Stock Company ‘Dorogobuzh’ are considered acceptable.

In view of the above, it is considered appropriate to no longer apply the measures established by Regulation (EC) No 2320/97.

In view of the above, the undertaking is considered to prevent circumvention and therefore it is acceptable.

Given the above and since the company also admitted itself that the assembly operation started due to the anti-dumping duties in place in the Community, it was concluded that there was insufficient due cause and no economic justification for the change in the pattern of trade other than the imposition of the anti-dumping duty.

Given the above, it was concluded that the variations in the costs of raw materials in the Community were not, as such, a factor which caused injury to the Community industry.

Considering the above, it was established for all countries concerned that dumping would likely continue or recur in significant quantities should measures be allowed to expire.

In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that, in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed on imports of SSF from the People’s Republic of China, Indonesia, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.

Considering the above, it was concluded that the product concerned and the granular PTFE produced and sold in the Community by the Community industry share the same physical and technical characteristics and the same basic end-uses.

In the light of the foregoing, it is considered that a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margin found, but should not be higher than the injury margin calculated in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation.

In view of the foregoing, the Commission considers that the goods in question, exported from Dubai, were of Indian origin and should therefore have been subject to the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of steel wire ropes originating in India.

In consideration of the foregoing, in order to ensure a coherent approach and to respect the principle of non-discrimination as reflected by Article 9(5) of the basic Regulation, it is necessary to terminate the proceedings concerning imports of hot-rolled coils originating in Bulgaria and South Africa, without imposition of anti-dumping duties.

In view of the findings above, it is considered appropriate that the anti-dumping duties imposed by the original measures should be set at the level mentioned below:

Considering the above, for all product types mentioned in recital 29, normal value was constructed on the basis of Article 2(3) of the basic Regulation.

It follows from the above that, as provided for by Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the anti-dumping measures applicable to imports of SWR, originating in India, the PRC, Ukraine and South Africa should be maintained.

In the light of the foregoing, it is provisionally concluded that the Community industry suffered material injury within the meaning of Article 3(5) of the basic Regulation.

Considering the above, it was therefore concluded that the allocation of SG&A expenses on the basis of actual turnover would be the most appropriate method in order to calculate SG&A for the different products involved.

In the light of the above findings, registration of imports of PET film consigned from Brazil and produced by Terphane and consigned from Israel and produced by Jolybar should cease.

In the light of the foregoing and in accordance with Article 9(4) of the basic Regulation, a definitive anti-dumping duty should be imposed at the level of the dumping margins found, since for all the exporting producers concerned the injury margins were found to be higher than the dumping margins.