Übersetzung für "Reasonable investor" in Deutsch

Therefore, the question whether, in making an investment decision, a reasonable investor would be likely to take into account a particular piece of information should be appraised on the basis of the ex ante available information.

For the purposes of applying paragraph 1, information which, if it were made public, would be likely to have a significant effect on the prices of the financial instruments, the related spot commodity contracts, or the auctioned products based on the emission allowances shall mean information a reasonable investor would be likely to use as part of the basis of his investment decisions.

Irrespective of this assessment, the financial situation of the company was such that no reasonable private investor in a market economy would have entered into a similar transaction.

Any changes in information shall be deemed material within the meaning of point (d) of Article 22(2) of Directive 2011/61/EU if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor, becoming aware of such information, would reconsider its investment in the AIF, including because such information could impact an investor’s ability to exercise its rights in relation to its investment, or otherwise prejudice the interests of one or more investors in the AIF.

If the statements had not been made, no reasonable investor would have offered a shareholder’s advance in these circumstances and assumed alone a very large financial risk.

If the statements had not been made, no reasonable investor would have o ered a shareholder’s advance in these circumstances and assumed alone a very large nancial risk.

For example, treatment is not fair and reasonable if the investor is denied access to national legal channels or put under pressure politically, or government decisions are opaque.

The definition is broad and includes information that a reasonable investor would be expected to know is inside information.

The investment is very reasonable for the investor looking for capital growth in one of the "in-areas" of Berlin.

Information is "material" (and hence, potentially subject to the prohibition on insider trading) if there is a substantial likelihood that a reasonable investor would consider the information important in determining whether to trade in a security, or if the information, if made public, likely would affect the market price of a company's securities.

Material information is information that would be important to a reasonable investor in deciding whether to buy, sell or hold stock including non-public infor- mation about Lubrizol's earnings, new products, pending mergers or acquisi- tions, alliances, partnerships or business gains or losses.

In general, information should be considered “material” if it could be expected that a reasonable investor would attach significance to the information in reaching an investment decision involving the Company’s securities.

The reason is that investors and entrepreneurs are totally blind to the opportunity.

There are plenty of other reasons investors should consider investing in this project:

For similar reasons, many investors do not want handgun manufacturers or tobacco companies in their portfolios.

For these reasons, a private investor could expect a significant increase in the value of its stake in KK.

And for that reason, some serious investors are looking to put large amounts of cash into cannabis research.

Due to the reason mentioned previously, investors usually only offer capital for a power-station project with state subsidies.

There are many reasons why investors choose to trade spot metals:

This degree of domination is another reason why many investors like to fine-tune their portfolios with regional and country-specific ETFs.

Despite this, I'd like to point to a few reasons why investors should consider Brazil.

For this reason, many professional investors are now pulling their money out of such industries and looking for alternatives.

That provides a further reason for American investors to shift part of their portfolios from dollars to other currencies that are not likely to experience rising inflation.

For this reason, investors will be required to ensure that originators and sponsors retain a material share of the risks and in any event not less than 5 per cent of the total so that effectively, equally originators and sponsors that are regulated by the CRD and those that are not regulated by it will have to retain a share of the risks.

It also noted the risk of conflict with the supplementary redundancy payments as part of the risks borne by reasonable investors.