Übersetzung für "Mass atrocity" in Deutsch

Eliminating mass atrocity crimes will continue to be one of the cardinal objectives of my tenure as Secretary-General.

I spent the better part of a decade looking at American responses to mass atrocity and genocide.

And I'd like to start by sharing with you one moment that to me sums up what there is to know about American and democratic responses to mass atrocity.

The Charter of the United Nations is not as clear as it could be when it comes to saving lives within countries in situations of mass atrocity.

It underscores the need both for a cross-sectoral approach and for sharing the burden in a common effort to eliminate, once and for all, the mass atrocity crimes of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.

To protect populations more effectively from mass-atrocity crimes, governments, international organizations, and civil-society groups should focus on practical challenges and learn from past mistakes.

Protecting people from mass-atrocity crimes will always be about assessing the risks and identifying the lesser of several evils in a particular situation.

Advocates of the French position want these countries to forswear their veto when a clear majority supports proposed action to mitigate the risk of a mass-atrocity crime.

The moral argument that the veto should not be used in cases of mass-atrocity crimes is overwhelming.

What is more important - protecting people from mass atrocity, such as a genocide and war crimes or protecting state sovereignty against interference by other states?

Second, global support for protection from mass atrocities is far from dead.

We are rallying in response to violations - before they degenerate into mass atrocities or war crimes.

Even so, the international community has too often failed to stand up to mass atrocities.

America's reputation suffers..., when we are perceived as idle in the face of mass atrocities and genocide.

I voted for the European Parliament motion for a resolution on the mass atrocities in Jos, Nigeria.

The next item is the Commission statement on the mass atrocities in Jos (Nigeria) in January and March.

I fully share the concerns expressed by honourable Members on the mass atrocities in Jos and I would like to assure you that they triggered a resolute EU response.

We support wholeheartedly the resolution on the mass atrocities in Nigeria, which unfortunately represent only one aspect of the bleak human rights picture in that country.

Mr President, in January and March we witnessed mass atrocities in Nigeria which caused the deaths of several hundred people, including women and children.

After a long professional life as a diplomat, international lawyer, and since 2003 as a judge of the International Criminal Court, Judge Kaul reaffirmed many times that aggressive war-making, the “supreme international crime” according to the Nuremberg Judgement, and the use of illegal armed force inevitably lead, time and again, to mass atrocities.

A decade later, the world’s record in fulfilling the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) remains poor, with hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq, Syria, Myanmar, Sudan, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, Burundi, Nigeria, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo still threatened by mass atrocities.

First, “the West” is hardly keen to intervene, diplomatically or militarily, to protect populations from mass atrocities.

Nor is it permissible under the moral first principles of the “responsibility to protect” doctrine unanimously endorsed by the UN General Assembly in 2005 in an effort to end mass atrocities once and for all.

If a future Syrian government were to join the International Criminal Court and consent to retroactive jurisdiction, the court would be free to prosecute any mass atrocities it saw fit to investigate.

Since the early 1990s, the international community has rightly withheld its imprimatur from amnesties for mass atrocities.