Übersetzung für "Equality of arms" in Deutsch

The argument of an "equality of arms" therefore does not apply.

The principle of equality of arms was never fully realized.

We funded research for a Consumer Panel in an effort to ensure “equality of arms.”

That rule has its basis in the principle of equality of arms and is therefore essential to the exercise of the rights of the defence.

Furthermore, the proposal aims at bringing the appeal proceedings pursuant to the Directive in line with the "equality of arms" principle and, subject to limited exceptions, provides for automatic suspensive effect of appeals against first instance decisions on applications for international protection.

The Committee would point out that as regards the admissibility of evidence collected and presented by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office in trial courts, where such evidence is admitted without any validation, this may create situations of inequality and violate the "equality of arms" principle.

Even if they are only limited, resources must be used in such a way as to respect the principle of equality of arms in cross-border cases.

With regard to fundamental rights, the ESC advocates a high level of protection, as expressed in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and in particular respect of the rights under Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which guarantee equality of arms between the parties involved in proceedings.

The time limits proposed for the stage of appeal allow for all pertinent procedural safeguards to be respected, including the right to an oral hearing and respect of the equality of arms.

The proposed amendments are, to a large extent, informed by evolving case law of the European Court of Justice regarding the general principles of Community Law, such as the right to defence, the principle of equality of arms, and the right to effective judicial protection.

Some letters contained allegations of corruption, of violation of the principle of equality of arms or of lack of independence of certain national courts, and violation of the right to a fair trial.

With a view to respecting the principle of equality of arms and established case law, it provides for the possibility to allow Member States to grant access to files only for specialised services of the state (advocates) where national security is concerned.

Finally, with regard to the principle of equality of arms, the Court recalls that the aim of that principle is to ensure a balance between the parties to proceedings, thereby guaranteeing that any document submitted to the court may be examined and challenged by any party to the proceedings.

The amendments ensure consistency with the evolving case law concerning the right to defence, the principle of equality of arms and the right to effective judicial protection.

In the context of insolvency proceedings, the right of creditors or their representatives to participate in accordance with the equality of arms principle is of particular importance.

In particular, it has asked whether, in view of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (specifically, the right of access to a tribunal and the principle of equality of arms between the parties to proceedings), the Commission may – as the EU’s representative – bring an action for damages on the basis of anti?competitive conduct when it was the Commission itself which previously adopted the decision finding that conduct unlawful and when the decision binds the competent national court, which cannot call into question the validity of that decision.

With regard, in particular, to the right to effective judicial protection, the Court notes that it comprises a number of elements, including the right of access to a tribunal and the principle of equality of arms.

These proposals promote the principle of equality of arms to provide all parties with the protection of a fair trial.

Secondly, the Advocate General concludes that the right to equality of arms does not preclude the Commission from bringing, on behalf of the EU, a claim for damages before the national courts, even though it was the Commission itself which previously conducted an infringement procedure which culminated in the decision that has formed the basis for the claim.

Given that the European Public Prosecutor’s Office is supported through institutional cooperation from all structures, bodies, offices and agencies of the EU, and by the Member State authorities, the suspect and the defence will not have similar resources for proving innocence and the "equality of arms" principle will be violated.

This instrument is designed to restore the "equality of arms" with some of our competitors in providing protection against unfair pricing practices in air transport.

In that respect, the Advocate General recalls that the purpose of the principle of equality of arms is to ensure a balance between the parties to the proceedings, thus guaranteeing that any document submitted to the court may be examined and challenged by any party to the proceedings.

Thus, in the Advocate General’s view, the Commission – simply because it has obtained certain information during an earlier investigation which it has not made available to the court – is not necessarily in an advantageous situation that infringes the principle of equality of arms.

In order to ensure equality of arms, those means should also be available to defendants in actions for damages, so that they can request the disclosure of evidence by those claimants.

Hoechst also submits that the principle of equality of arms means that the Commission cannot decide alone whether, and to what extent, it will grant access to the documents which a party might use as exculpatory evidence.