Übersetzung für "Klage bei gericht" in Englisch

Because the suspension was unlawful no legal proceedings are pending.

You can also look at http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/glossary/glossary_en.htm for an explanation of some of the legal terms employed.

Your application must be lodged with the court/tribunal that has jurisdiction to deal with it.

They have brought proceedings in an Italian court, which has referred the matter to the Court of Justice.

Potential complainants should also consider bringing an action before a national court.

An action can be brought against the cancellation or the withdrawal of the approval.

Whereas, in accordance with Protocol 2 concerning Article 119 of the Treaty annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, benefits under occupational social security schemes shall not be considered as remuneration if and in so far as they are attributable to periods of employment prior to 17 May 1990, except in the case of workers or those claiming under them who have, before that date, initiated legal proceedings or raised an equivalent claim under the applicable national law;

It may also mean that the case is decided in the court they wish, if it is established that the court has jurisdiction.

This continued until 1758, when a local brewer, John Lewis, took the gatekeeper, who stopped him from entering the park, to court.

For the purposes of Article III-214 of the Constitution, benefits under occupational social security schemes shall not be considered as remuneration if and insofar as they are attributable to periods of employment prior to 17 May 1990, except in the case of workers or those claiming under them who have before that date initiated legal proceedings or introduced an equivalent claim under the applicable national law.

The claim(s) is (are) not yet subject of an instrument permitting enforcement in the applicant State.

In the case of unlawful aid, complainants will be reminded of the possibility to initiate proceedings before national courts, which can order the suspension or recovery of such aid [15].

Human Rights Law gives specific rights but, largely to avoid bypassing national court systems, individuals are required to exhaust local remedies before a claim can be brought to an international court.

Any measure implementing this Chapter, as regards workers, shall cover all benefits under occupational social security schemes derived from periods of employment subsequent to 17 May 1990 and shall apply retroactively to that date, without prejudice to workers or those claiming under them who have, before that date, initiated legal proceedings or raised an equivalent claim under national law.

It is well established that benefits payable under occupational social security schemes are not to be considered as remuneration insofar as they are attributable to periods of employment prior to 17 May 1990, except in the case of workers or those claiming under them who initiated legal proceedings or brought an equivalent claim under the applicable national law before that date.

When the complaint brought by Mr Ioannidis was upheld, the IKA brought proceedings in the Greek courts.

When Mr Ioannidis' objection was allowed, IKA brought an appeal before the Greek courts.

Thus, as regards consumer contracts, a consumer also has the choice of bringing an action before the courts for the place of his domicile if two conditions are met.

This also means that those affected by decisions of governance bodies should have the possibility to lodge an appeal with an independent tribunal.

Taking the view that that notification amounted to dismissal, Mr Palacios de la Villa brought an action before the Spanish courts which referred a number of questions to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Directive 2000/78 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation.

Even if that is so, the fact remains that where individuals intended — as the complainants did in the main proceedings — to rely on the, albeit optional, jurisdiction which the national legislature, when transposing Directive 1999/70, conferred on those specialised courts to hear and determine disputes arising from the 2003 Act, the principle of effectiveness requires that those individuals should also be able to seek before the same courts the protection of the rights which they can derive directly from the directive itself, if it should emerge from the checks undertaken by the referring court that the obligation to divide their action into two separate claims and to bring the claim based directly on the directive before an ordinary court leads to procedural complications liable to render excessively difficult the exercise of those rights conferred on the parties by Community law.

The Court held that Community law, in particular the principle of effectiveness, requires that a specialised court which is called upon, under the , albeit optional, jurisdiction conferred on it by the legislation transposing Directive 1999/70 concerning the framework agreement on fixedterm work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, to hear and determine a claim based on an infringement of that legislation must also have jurisdiction to hear and determine an applicant’s claims arising directly from the directive itself in respect of the period between the deadline for transposing the directive and the date on which the transposing legislation entered into force, if it is established that the obligation on that applicant to bring, at the same time, a separate claim based directly on the directive before an ordinary court would involve procedural disadvantages liable to render excessively difficult the exercise of the rights conferred on him by Communitylaw .

If the creditor wishes to make good his claim against the debtor he must normally begin by bringing a complaint before the court in order to obtain a judgment against the debtor.

For the purposes of Article 157 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, benefits under occupational social security schemes shall not be considered as remuneration if and in so far as they are attributable to periods of employment prior to 17 May 1990, except in the case of workers or those claiming under them who have before that date initiated legal proceedings or introduced an equivalent claim under the applicable national law.

For the purposes of Article III 214 of the Constitution, benefits under occupational social security schemes shall not be considered as remuneration if and insofar as they are attributable to periods of employment prior to 17 May 1990, except in the case of workers or those claiming under them who have before that date initiated legal proceedings or introduced an equivalent claim under the applicable national law.

If your negotiations with the vendor have failed and you wish to take things further, you can either take legal action in the national courts or opt for an alternative dispute resolution scheme.