Übersetzung für "Eine klare abgrenzung" in Englisch

Democracy requires the separation of powers and a clear line between opposition and government.

It is now a matter of making a clear distinction between the Network and Eurojust.

The responsibilities of all those involved in the transit system must be clearly defined.

However, there is a clear separation of tasks and responsibilities.

There must be a clear delimitation and separation against products of competing products.

For a regulatory adjustment with regard to FMI a clear definition of the relevant markets is necessary.

There is therefore a clear boundary between animal and man.

There should be a clear delineation of responsibility and accountability.

Drawing clear delineations between these terms is not always possible.

Success in this partnership will require a clear separation of roles.

The first geographic .mobi domain to be released was Helsinki.mobi.

This strict obligation would require a clear separation line between LIFE+ and other funds.

Terms of reference must be clearly defined and responsibility must be accepted for mistakes.

A clear distinction must thus be made between geographical names and authorized generic titles.

In other words, reform of internal customs checks and a clear distinction between those and the external customs checks.

Therefore, it was argued, the keywas to ensure a firm legal basis instead, including a clear mandate for the institution.

However, this requires a clear definition of the concept of research and development.

Here, enforcement activities will focus on the clear distinction between the disclosures for provisions and those for contingent liabilities.

There used to be a clear divide between the roles of the CMO and CTO/CIO.

Simplification of the currently extremely complicated regulation system, uniform interpretation of rules and obligations, consistency of the legislative environment and a clear delineation of responsibilities are essential for increasing the efficiency of cohesion policy.

To my mind, there is no clear demarcation of the competence of the Member States and the Union in this area.

In particular, I think it is very good that we have a clear delineation between port infrastructure and port superstructure in the Piecyk report.

The forces of democracy in Congo have made a series of demands which we should actively support: defence of unity and self-determination, opening up the government for democratic forces, precise arrangements for future elections, clear dissociation from xenophobic tendencies, mobilisation of the interministerial commission for the protection of Tutsis and expansion of this to the whole territory, establishment of a ceasefire, withdrawal of all foreign troops and return of Congolese refugees to their home territory, the need to establish clearly who attacked whom, use of the media to promote peace propaganda rather than the propaganda of war and hatred, and, not least, provision of a peace-keeping force to ensure peace between the Democratic Republic of Congo and its neighbours in the Great Lakes region.

I would therefore like to ask the Commission the following question: do you or do you not think that a clear distinction between what is patentable and what is not is essential to this text?

For example, if there is a clear distinction between the competences which fall to European institutions and those which fall to Member States, we can dispense with this word which, in any case, no-one understands - subsidiarity.

In preparing the report, a definition of what renewables actually are has been put forward.

In this debate, I do not find the discussion about producing a clear demarcation of the areas that form part of the policy of Member States and those that fall within the Union' s remit, to be threatening.