Translation of "Würde dann" in English

I think the very least we could do is have a study carried out so that we would base our decision on facts as they affect the citizen of the Union.

That party would not then be acting in accordance with the directive.

That makes a mockery of it for most of the people who eat chocolate in Europe.

Then it would have some credibility when it spoke of democracy.

Indeed, if it did, it would be corrected by the Council of Ministers.

If not, then I would recommend that you watch it.

This would also include investment in modernising energy supply systems.

The question would then be superfluous.

Then no one would take it seriously.

I am sorry, but it really would not give a fair picture.

Then the wealth of Europe would become the common wealth.

After that, the rest of Amendment No 26 would remain.

This would then allow us to make certain changes to the precautionary measures already taken.

These would become common principles for all the institutions.

In that case we would be deceiving both ourselves and others.

I would then withdraw my original text and accept Mr Chanterie's amendment.

This would be somewhat along the same lines as the Commission's draft directive.

Had that been the case, today's debate would not have exuded this faint odour of electioneering.

It would then take appropriate action.

The reduction in the number of players in this market would thus be offset.

This would lead to a total collapse of the market throughout the EU.

Then it would not be a Community burden; it would be a burden on the Member States.

If that was the case each time then this could not happen.

If that were the case then this would not happen to you again.

Which legislation would then be in trouble?

North-South transport would obtain a wider range of possible transit routes.

This would then be added to Amendment No 149.

The Liberal Group would vote against the resolution.