Translation of "Haager landkriegsordnung" in English

The Hague Regulations of 1907 was applicable in the Second World War.

According to the Hague Conventions of 1907, they were not allowed to be forced to work.

This was in violation of the Hague Land Warfare Rule and rights of all humanity.

The Hague Convention of 1907 distinguished between militia, volunteer corps and members of the regular armed forces.

A mass expulsion is to be brought to the Hague Regulations in no way consistent.

However, during the First World War, acceptance of these first Hague Conventions was severely restricted by the so-called all-participation clause.

The Roerich Pact contained eight articles and several significant innovations compared with the general provisions of Articles 27 and 56 of the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907.

Article 154 specifically provides that the Fourth Geneva Convention is supplementary to these provisions in the Hague Conventions.

The Introduction makes it clear that military necessity plays an important role in the application of the Hague Land Warfare Convention and that the latter does not define formal conditions.

At the same time, Carl Duisberg developed - together with Fritz Haber - poison gases such as "Gruenkreuz” (phosgene) and "Mustard gas”, tested them on the front for the first time and pushed for their use – knowingly in breach of The Hague Land Warfare Convention.

During the trial, the defence argued that the exact nature of the participation of the defendants could not be established, that the chain of command was not clear, that the Hague Convention allowed taking such measures against guerrillas and that it could not be proven that there was any intentional or particular cruelty involved in the commission of the acts in question.

The Commissary Government of the German Reich (SHAEF Legislator USA) is bound within the The Hague Land War Convention to follow the directives of the victorious power USA in respect to the protection of its interests towards Germany until [the advent of] a future peace treaty.

The Supreme Administrative Court in Leipzig found in the judgement of the case of Army Major Florian Pfaff in 2005, that according to the Hague Convention of 1907 - the so-called Hague Land Warfare Convention - supportive deliveries to parties participating in conflict must be prevented.

This couldn't be justified, with reference to the Geneva Conventions and to the Hague Conventions, by any law of war.

With the support of the other European powers, the occupying powers continuously and massively violate international law as laid down in a binding manner in the Hague Regulations, the Geneva conventions, the international Convnetions on economic, social and cultural rights (social pact) and on civil and political rights (civil pact), as well as the Charter of the United Nations.

During the trial, the defence argued that the exact nature of the participation of the defendants could not be established, that the chain of command was not clear, that the Hague Convention allowed taking such measures against guerrillas and that it could not be proven that there was any intentional or particular cruelty involved in the commission of the acts in question.

The fact that it occurred frequently on the German side may be partially explained by the great extent of the enemy territory occupied by fairly weak military forces, but also by the fanatical resistance of the population of these occupied regions, who paid no heed to the relevant regulations of the Hague Land Warfare Convention of 1907.

Was it perhaps because the Wehrmacht granted insurgent partisan combatants the status of legal combatants and granted female partisans free passage, which it was not obliged to do under the Hague Convention on Land Warfare?

It was this which necessitated requisitions and labour conscription in occupied territories, legal under Article 52 of The Fourth Hague Convention on Land Warfare 18 October 1907.

We must particularly keep in mind that the Hague Land Warfare Convention, according to Section 6 of its Introduction, serves only as a general guideline for the warring parties in their relations with each other and the population, and applies only insofar as military interests permit.

At the same time, Carl Duisberg developed - together with Fritz Haber - poison gases such as "Gruenkreuz (phosgene) and “Mustard gas, tested them on the front for the first time and pushed for their use – knowingly in breach of The Hague Land Warfare Convention.

The Belgian court-martial in Lüttich has stated that certain regulations of the Hague Land Warfare Convention are entirely outdated.

The natives in North, Central and in South "America" were not treated according to the Hague Convention, nor treated according to the Geneva Conventions, nor treated according to the Magna Charta of the human rights.

If there were no special privileges for the US, Americans would present a miserable figure before the ICC. The US government would have to admit that it is unable or unwilling to instill proper discipline in its armed forces, unable to guarantee that its forces will abide by the Geneva Convention and the Haag Protocol on Land Warfare.

Iraq War by the invading military forces, principally those of the United States and United Kingdom, and subsequent occupation, violated the law of war such as the Geneva Conventions on the Humanitarian Laws of War (1949), Additional Protocols to Geneva Conventions (1977) and Hague Conventions on the Laws of War (1899, 1907) in numerous respects, including the following:

Under The Hague Land Warfare Convention guerrilla fighters are no combatants because they do not show their arms openly.