Übersetzung für "Loss of opportunity" in Deutsch

A loss of biodiversity is a loss of economic opportunity.

Loss of opportunity to have a baby.

The Ombudsman recommended that the Commission compensate the complainant for the loss of opportunity it had suffered.

Indeed, it states that it accepts the idea that the loss of an opportunity to fill a post constitutes material damage.

The Commission makes clear on that point that it accepts the idea that the loss of an opportunity to obtain a post is material damage for which compensation can be paid.

We have no liability to you for any loss of profit, loss of business, business interruption, or loss of business opportunity.

Moreover, in case of delays in political and programmatic decisions, extra costs are anticipated caused by a pro rata increase of costs of current contracts (the In-Orbit-Validation contracts10), and loss of market opportunity as a result of the arrival of competing systems.

Apr. 1, 1966). While such a requirement may be significant for safety reasons, it results in loss of the opportunity for economic disinfection in many cases of media having high transmission factors since a substantial portion of the photon energy entering the medium is not actually utilized and is lost in the photoreactor walls.

Secondly, Ms Girardot claims that the plea alleging that the Court of First Instance is making good the loss of a guarantee and not the loss of an opportunity is inadmissible since that plea was not raised at first instance before the Court of First Instance.

That method does not misinterpret the notion of loss of chance, but is suited to the reparation of damage resulting from the loss of an opportunity which is not, by definition, certain to materialise.

With regard at least to the loss of an opportunity to obtain an anticipated advantage — which is the situation in this case (the loss of an opportunity to be recruited) — a feature common to the national laws which recognise it is that it applies where an uncertain event occurs and thereby renders the expected result forever unknown.

Under Danish law, which does not contain the notion of loss of opportunity, the decisions of public authorities which are unlawful on account of procedural or substantive errors may form the basis of an application for damages, in the context of which demonstration of a causal link between the unlawful act and the damage is established where there exists a certain probability that the person in question would have been employed if the decision had not been unlawful on account of that error.

In that case, the Conseil d’État held that the applicant could not claim the benefit of payments that he would have received as a student of the École Normale Supérieure, on account of his loss of the opportunity to pass the competition for entry to that school.

Although the Court set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance in that case, it nonetheless did not have to rule on the issue of the loss of an opportunity.

Accordingly, the assessment of the chance that Ms Girardot had of having her application accepted cannot be optional, since it forms part of the very definition of the notion of loss of opportunity.

With regard to the loss of an opportunity of being recruited, it is not the anticipated amounts which constitute the damage, but the expectation of earning them.

In other words, since the Commission acknowledges the relevance of the criterion of earnings for the purposes of compensating for the loss of an opportunity to be recruited, including as the starting point for its own method of calculation, it cannot, in the context of the appeal, criticise the method and extent of compensation for the damage suffered.

It added, both in its pleadings and at the hearing, that the aim of its appeal is that the Court should identify a consistent legal argument and method for the purpose of calculating the loss of an opportunity to obtain a post.

However, in the event that the person concerned had, during that intervening period, taken up a post that was better paid than that which she could have obtained at the Commission during the same period, no loss of earnings would be suffered, although the person concerned would, nonetheless, have indeed suffered a loss of opportunity.

The Court of First Instance therefore did not assess the actual and certain damage linked to the loss of opportunity, but determined the hypothetical damage linked to loss of earnings, which presupposes an entitlement to be recruited.

The Court of First Instance thereby misinterpreted the concept of loss of opportunity as loss of the certainty of obtaining a post, and in so doing failed to recognise the margin of discretion and freedom to choose which the Community institutions must have in the area of recruitment.

In the event that the post she held during the period in question had been better paid than that which she could have held at the Commission, she would have suffered no loss of earnings while she would still have suffered a loss of opportunity.

The quantification of that loss of opportunity ought to be based on something other than the loss of earnings, which presupposes that recruitment was a certainty.

Firstly, the Court of First Instance alone has jurisdiction to carry out an assessment of the damage resulting from the loss of an opportunity.

Accordingly, unless the Commission complains that the Court of First Instance did not specify the criteria adopted to carry out the assessment of the damage suffered, the Commission is not justified in criticising the assessment made in the judgment under appeal on that matter nor, a fortiori, in expecting the Court of Justice to issue a decision of principle on the method to be used to calculate compensation for material damage resulting from the loss of an opportunity.