Übersetzung für "Schulden aufnehmen" in Englisch

Or you could issue a lot of debt.

They had to take control of their debts and be answerable for them.

The five countries in trouble will need to place tens of billions of euros in new debt and roll over even larger amounts of old debt.

Because the government can still borrow mainly from the Japanese people, its balance sheet remains stable.

The state can also take on unlimited new debts in order to meet the interest repayments.

I did not pay the previous debt, and now I had a new debt.

Once again, the European undertakings cannot use debts for their working capital and therefore must provide themselves with capital.

When, in 2000, the MBTA's budget became limited, the agency began to run into debt from scheduled projects and obligatory Big Dig remediation work, which have now given the MBTA the highest debt of any transit authority in the country.

The British government already must borrow £112 billion ($172 billion) more than it had planned when it announced its deficit-reduction plan in June 2010.

Banks themselves, however, are the heaviest borrowers, routinely funding more than 90% – and sometimes more than 95% – of their investments by taking on debt.

Such firms are also accumulating financial assets – sometimes faster than they are accumulating corporate debt – which suggests that they lack profitable long-term investment opportunities and portfolio-investment options in liberalized financial markets.

Another worrying trend is the continuous increase in financial distress since 2010, with more and more of the population reporting the need to draw on their savings and, more recently, even to run into debt to pay for everyday living costs.

When, in 2000, the MBTA's income was capped, the agency began to run up large debts from already-scheduled projects and obligatory Big Dig remediation work.

The rules on sound and sustainable public finances mean that euroarea Member States live within their means and do not build up excessive debts that will burden future generations of taxpayers.

We currently have short to medium-term access to EUR 150 million for further acquisitions that could consequently be made without incurring debts.

This would hurt the credibility of the Euro, and other participating countries would have to pay a higher price when they want to make loans for their respective debts.

This will dampen domestic demand in these countries also over the coming years, as households will hardly (be able to) take up new debt and are likely to spend larger parts of their disposable income on debt redemption rather than consumption.

The Company has agreed that it will not incur any additional debt obligations without first obtaining the consent of the holders of the Bonds, and will set aside any proceeds received from asset sales in excess of $250,000 towards repayment of the Bonds.

This means that, in the long term (assuming that policies remain unchanged and including necessary interest payments), the government will spend considerably more than it takes in and will have to assume more and more debt.

The risk of free-riders, attracted by low interest rates, continuing to take on debt, would also be very high.

If you require a mortgage and need to go into debt to invest, are you really even making an investment?

The crisis in the budgets of a few EU Member States who have been living beyond their means (or – as in the case of Ireland – have been obliged to take on high levels of debt in order to rescue their national banking systems) has turned into a crisis for the common currency.

On the other hand, if the system is defied, or reinterpreted in a way that alters its intended meaning, bond markets could once again become nervous. Ireland knows better than most countries the difficulties that can arise from having to borrow to fund services or repay maturing debts.

Europeans today have latched onto the practical side of Hamilton’s argument – that is, the idea that debt mutualization might be a means to cheaper credit; but they have worked out neither the political institutions, nor the shared public virtue, that Hamilton deemed crucial.

Proponents of MMT argue governments that control the printing presses for their own currency should take on as much debt as required to achieve policy objectives such as income redistribution, a universal basic income, full employment, or a national health service. Here, the argument is as long as inflation is contained, servicing an increased level of debt will not become a significant problem.

Even the UAE and Qatar were forced to take a series of measures to adjust their break-even oil prices to the actual price. Only Kuwait, due to its extraordinarily high production volume per capita, did not have to take on any debt despite an oil price level of around USD 50 per barrel.

There is no "austerity". This is just propaganda of the states, which prefer to take on new debt rather than carry out structural reforms. No country in Europe has a balanced budget.

Between harvests, families have to get into debt in order to feed themselves, in some cases paying interest rates of 300%. Taking a long-term view, the organisation worked to boost the production capacity of the local population, so that they had access to food all year round and were better equipped to generate a more stable income.