Übersetzung für "Gerichtlich anfechten" in Englisch

The person must have a right to a hearing and be able to challenge the decision in the courts.

The public must be informed of the development decision and can challenge it before the courts.

They must therefore have access to judicial redress procedures.

The State of California can either comply with this or can try to fight this order in the Courts.

Moreover, in view of the length of time the matter referred to in the petition has been going on, it is also launching an informal consultation process with the Commissioner to request that a response be provided within a shorter timeframe, because the petitioner is requesting confirmation that his product complies with European legislation or, failing that, at least to have a ruling that he can challenge before the Court and which will therefore allow him to have justice.

I understand that a Hungarian player who has had his transfer put on hold is probably going to mount a legal challenge.

Public interest groups, such as non-governmental organizations, will be allowed, under the system, to require public authorities to act, when need be, and challenge their decisions before the courts, when those decisions are illegal.

In accordance with the principle of sincere cooperation laid down in the Treaty, national courts are required to interpret national procedural rules in a way that enables natural and legal persons to challenge before the courts the legality of a national measure adopted pursuant to a regulation and, thereby, to call in question the validity of that regulation.

One of the obstacles to rapid recovery lies in the fact that recipients of aids wrongly paid are increasingly inclined to contest the decision in court.

The system will allow public interest groups, such as non-governmental organisations, to require public authorities to act, when need be, and challenge their decisions before the courts, when those decisions are illegal.

These members felt, on the other hand, that it would be appropriate for the Constitution to mention explicitly that, in accordance with the principle of loyal cooperation as interpreted by the Court of Justice, national courts are required , so far as possible, to interpret and apply national procedural rules governing the exercise of rights of action in a way that enables natural and legal persons to challenge before the courts the legality of any decision or other national measure relative to the application to them of a Community act of general application, by pleading the invalidity of such an act.

In fact, where a competitor is faced with a rates approval decision which makes it more difficult for it to establish a proposed contractual relationship with the notified operator, it must also have the possibility of bringing proceedings to contest the fact that those rates have not been set on the basis of costorientation, where appropriate.

If particulars of an agreement have been duly notified, however, it is doubtful whether a third party has the right to challenge on matters of substance.

Second, the national court requests the Court of Justice to give a ruling on whether telecommunications operators falling within the category which Regulation No 2887/2000 classes as beneficiaries, namely competing third parties operating in the telecommunications sector, are able to challenge before the courts decisions of the NRAs authorising the tariffs of notified operators for the provision of unbundled access to their local loop.

Any party may challenge the adaptation of the measure or order before a court.

These parties may challenge the Council's Decision before the Court of First Instance.

These parties may challenge the Council's regulation before the Court of First Instance.

We will challenge this in court!

An action of appeal may not be regarded as compulsory, merely optional.

However, the use of these devices to challenge in court is quite simple.

However, the use of these devices to challenge in court is quite simple.

The others very likely will be called to court.

The legislation is currently the subject of a legal challenge.

After all our paintball court challenge colleagues and enjoy adernalinu.

Mr Biderman plans to challenge the ban in court.

DaimlerChrysler may challenge a Commission decision, possibly imposing a fine, before the European courts in Luxembourg.

The applicant in question has two months in which to challenge the Commission's analysis before the European Court in Luxembourg.

In the present case Hargis has deliberately avoided the judicial challenge and accepted the official decision.